Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:to7ea2lge66s5ngif7ojvqb65t0hpilkjc@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Sat, 01 Jul 2006 10:08:10 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:sv6ca2tt3ippcoikmte010a7a6jeqv4tie@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| >| >
| >| >*** off, you couldn't see your reflection in Cassini's mirror if it
had
| >| >one.
| >| >You can't even see Cassini. Knowing you, I doubt you could even find
| >Saturn.
| >| >It's the planet with a ring around it, easily seen with a 30x
telescope.
| >| >Being
| >| >in the ecliptic it is visible from Oz, although d-Ceph isn't.
| >|
| >| I looked at it many years ago.
| >
| >Not from Oz... You can't see d-Ceph through the Earth, it is eclipsed.
|
| I can see Saturn any night with the naked eye. Its more yellow than the
others.
| I've seen its rings through a six inch reflector I once borrowed.
| I haven't looked for D ceph and wont.


LOL! You don't know when you are having your chain pulled, do you?



|
| >
| >|
| >| >Telescopes are not expensive:
| >| > http://www.telescopeplanet.co.uk/
| >| >A lot cheaper than the 3 cases of Glenlivet you owe me.
| >|
| >| BULL!!!
| >
| >Maybe you are destitute... I can afford a telescope, but then,
| >I already have one.
|
| Small telescopes are boring. Do you have a decent tracking system?

Don't tell Kellerher about tracking systems, he doesn't understand
sidereal days. There is much to a clock drive and an equatorial mount,
H, I don't know what you mean by "decent". That's kinda like asking
"Does your car have a decent engine?" Like - who even thinks about it?




|
| >| >| Your Cassini is not a TWLS experiment. It is an OWLS comparison.
| >| >
| >| >You can make it one easily enough, ask Cassini the time. I'll
guarantee
| >| >it won't agree with Einstein's prediction.
| >|
| >| I'll agree with that...but it will be difficult to actually fix its
orbit
| >| around Saturn accurately enough to know.
| >
| >
| >If you had a telescope you'd see a virtual image of what you
| >were doing 2.4 hours earlier, reflected in Cassini's mirror if it had
one,
| >and the virtual ruler against your virtual nose would read zero.
|
| ....count those twenty-four divisions again....

0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0.

Still 0. Do you have trouble counting backwards as well, H?
See, that is what we mean by big hard words like "direction" and "vector".
When you count from 0 to 12 on a ruler, it is different from counting
from 12 to 0, it has a different "direction". Professors of hard sums
know this, but stupid physicists who don't know what negative numbers
are can't figure it out.

|
|
| >| >Arsehole! You never learned x-x = 0, not 2x.
| >|
| >| I never said it wasn't..
| >
| >Yes you did, you said (t'A-tA)/2AB = c where x = AB. I can forgive
| >you for getting the equation upside down since you are a wabo and
| >Waboland is upside down. You are still an arsehole, c = 0/0
|
| Stop trying to wriggle out behind my typos.

Wriggle, H? Typo?
Are you saying you don't know '2' from '0'?
Look at the keyboard, not the keypad. You use the other hand
to type it (unless you type with one finger, of course).

Either x-x = 0x or x-x = 2x.
Which is it, H?
See, Einstein, he pretends he doesn't know either.
The huckster says x-x = 2x.
That's where all these clever cunts, University Professors like Baez
and people like Timo Neimenim Ph.D. (Outback of Queensland)
are stupid enough to believe the fraud, and you've fallen for his trick
too.

Einstein knew. He even said:
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former." --Albert Einstein
Not bad from the same guy that said

"an observer approaching a source of light with the velocity c,
this source of light must appear of infinite intensity." - Einstein

"the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an
infinitely great velocity."- Einstein


He was having a whale of a time, laughing all the way to the bank.

"Man usually avoids attributing cleverness to somebody else
-- unless it is an enemy." -- Albert Einstein

See, I'd rather be your enemy, then you have to admit I'm cleverer than you.


|
| >| >
| >| >I told you, I'm talking about equations, not physics.
| >| > My distance from the mirror is -x, the mirror's distance from me is
| >| >+x. x+(-x) = 0x, not 2x. I said nothing about any virtual image.
| >|
| >| ...Because you never studied optic.
| >
| >You never studied math. You failed 2nd grade and don't know what
| >negative numbers are or how to add them.
| >
| >|
| >| Your virtual image is distance x from the mirror. That is 2x from you.
| >
| >Then a foot ruler against your nose should have a virtual number 24
against
| >your virtual nose. Empirical evidence says you are wrong.
|
| There are twenty four intervals between nose images. COUNT THE BLOODY
| THINGS....

I did.
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0.
I learned to count even before I learned negative numbers, I can even count
down
as well as up. You didn't learn that, did you?
Do the experiment, read the numbers off as you count them.
Still, if you want to believe there are 24 inches to a foot, see George
Hammond.
He's as crazy as you.

|
|
| >| >So says Queen Henri the shithead who writes equations as seen in
| >| >horizontal looking glasses. Learn what "minus" means, you may
| >| >become as smart as my grandson.
| >|
| >| It's a pity you studied radio engineering instead of physics.
| >
| >
| >It's a pity you don't know what negative numbers are, especially
| >since you are upside down. Go on, Queen Henri, put a 1 ft ruler
| >between your nose and a mirror and see if it says 24 inches, arsehole.
|
| ..and they could have easily walked across the ice to get to warmer
| climates....
|
| >Androcles
| >
|
|
| HW.
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
|
| Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
|


.

Loading