Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: jem <xxx@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 09:53:54 -0400
kenseto wrote:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151705107.602690.292620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:h9i9a2h2s3nh091idcat6dkckmcdotku3i@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 00:29:35 GMT, "kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1151589172.647807.111530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:bp5u929ssf9npss2i5m9at1oljkhj5v78n@xxxxxxxxxx
Before Einstein, Lorentz's aether theory satisfactorily
explained
the
MMX
null
result via his LTs. However, in spite of this, the null result
was
still
taken
as sound evidence that no aether exists. That is still the
official
verdict.
It is a fact, that because of Lorentz's (Fitzgerald's) supposed
'contractions',
it is a feature of LET that any observer moving through the
aether
will
always
MEASURE the OW speed of light as being c.
This is wrong. OWLS never been measured.
Of course it's been measured.
Now, you may object that it's not been measured using a distance
measured with sticks and two clocks at either end, but that's not
the
only way to measure OWLS.
Deciding to measure it some way other than the way you want it to
be
measured is probably a good decision.
ROTFLOL....Here's what you are saying: We dont want to measure OWLS
the
normal way. We invented a new way to measure OWLS so that the result
is
guaranteed to be c.
Ken Seto
There is a very simple way to establish the value of light speed wrt
all
objects in any one frame.
Just measure TWLS. It has the same value.
No this is an assumption. There is a reason why the SRians refused to
measure OWLS directly. If they are confident that OWLS=TWLS=c why don't
they
measure OWLS directly to make sure that it is so?
If you are so confident that OWLS =/= TWLS why don't you measure OWLS
directly to make sure that it is so?
If physicists are so confident that OWLS=TWLS why don't they measure OWLS
directly to make sure that their assumption is correct? Furthermore, if the
SR postulate says that OWLS is a constant c why the SRians refuse to do
direct measurement of OWLS??
And those same physicists confidently assume that if an elephant and a mouse were to be dropped from the same height in an unimpeded gravitational field, both would hit the ground at the same time. So why do they refuse to take the animals up to the moon and perform a direct test to make sure their assumption is correct? What are they afraid of?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- References:
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: PD
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Prev by Date: Re: N.hamdan - self advertiser
- Next by Date: Re: PHOTON MASS -- A FACT. MASSLESS PARTICLES -- NOT FACT.
- Previous by thread: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Next by thread: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
