Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:01mga2l7isk637rm7t28rdj6p4rahas1v0@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 06:28:16 GMT, "Sorcerer"
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
|
| >
| >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
| >news:to7ea2lge66s5ngif7ojvqb65t0hpilkjc@xxxxxxxxxx
|
| >| >If you had a telescope you'd see a virtual image of what you
| >| >were doing 2.4 hours earlier, reflected in Cassini's mirror if it had
| >one,
| >| >and the virtual ruler against your virtual nose would read zero.
| >|
| >| ....count those twenty-four divisions again....
| >
| >0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0.
| >
| >Still 0. Do you have trouble counting backwards as well, H?
| >See, that is what we mean by big hard words like "direction" and
"vector".
| >When you count from 0 to 12 on a ruler, it is different from counting
| >from 12 to 0, it has a different "direction". Professors of hard sums
| >know this, but stupid physicists who don't know what negative numbers
| >are can't figure it out.
|
| Stubborn ***..
|
| I said, rub out the numbers.
|
| Then you get
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24
|

Ok, look in the mirror and there are two Henri Wilsons, a real one and a
virtual one.
Count them. Stupid fucking abo.

I've explained it to you, now *** off.

Androcles.


| >
| >|
| >|
| >| >| >Arsehole! You never learned x-x = 0, not 2x.
| >| >|
| >| >| I never said it wasn't..
| >| >
| >| >Yes you did, you said (t'A-tA)/2AB = c where x = AB. I can forgive
| >| >you for getting the equation upside down since you are a wabo and
| >| >Waboland is upside down. You are still an arsehole, c = 0/0
| >|
| >| Stop trying to wriggle out behind my typos.
| >
| >Wriggle, H? Typo?
| >Are you saying you don't know '2' from '0'?
| >Look at the keyboard, not the keypad. You use the other hand
| >to type it (unless you type with one finger, of course).
| >
| >Either x-x = 0x or x-x = 2x.
| >Which is it, H?
| >See, Einstein, he pretends he doesn't know either.
| >The huckster says x-x = 2x.
| >That's where all these clever cunts, University Professors like Baez
| >and people like Timo Neimenim Ph.D. (Outback of Queensland)
| >are stupid enough to believe the fraud, and you've fallen for his trick
| >too.
| >
| >Einstein knew. He even said:
| > "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and
I'm
| >not sure about the former." --Albert Einstein
| >Not bad from the same guy that said
| >
| > "an observer approaching a source of light with the velocity c,
| > this source of light must appear of infinite intensity." - Einstein
| >
| > "the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an
| > infinitely great velocity."- Einstein
| >
| >
| >He was having a whale of a time, laughing all the way to the bank.
| >
| >"Man usually avoids attributing cleverness to somebody else
| >-- unless it is an enemy." -- Albert Einstein
| >
| >See, I'd rather be your enemy, then you have to admit I'm cleverer than
you.
|
| You know A, you are becoming almost as painful as Andersen.
|
|
|
| >| >| Your virtual image is distance x from the mirror. That is 2x from
you.
| >| >
| >| >Then a foot ruler against your nose should have a virtual number 24
| >against
| >| >your virtual nose. Empirical evidence says you are wrong.
| >|
| >| There are twenty four intervals between nose images. COUNT THE BLOODY
| >| THINGS....
| >
| >I did.
| >0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0.
| >I learned to count even before I learned negative numbers, I can even
count
| >down
| >as well as up. You didn't learn that, did you?
| >Do the experiment, read the numbers off as you count them.
| >Still, if you want to believe there are 24 inches to a foot, see George
| >Hammond.
| >He's as crazy as you.
|
| He probably studied optics.....unlike radio engineers.
|
|
|
| HW.
| www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
|
| Appropriate message snipping is considerate and painless.
|


.