Where is the flaw?
- From: cafeinst@xxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Jul 2006 12:20:45 -0700
This post is really a follow-up to another post a few months ago:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/browse_frm/thread/31732ed283f482d5/c72b57a46f96a9b2?lnk=st&q=cafeinst+relativity&rnum=2&hl=en#c72b57a46f96a9b2
See http://homepage.mac.com/ardeshir/"TwinParadox".pdf
I'm not an expert on relativity; I just took physics in high school,
which covered that topic. However, recollecting what I learned there,
it seems that this paper does a good job refuting special relativity.
Are there any experts out there who can set me straight and point to
the flaw in this paper, assuming that there is a flaw?
Thank you,
Craig
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Where is the flaw?
- From: Spoonfed
- Re: Where is the flaw?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Where is the flaw?
- From: Igor
- Re: Where is the flaw?
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Where is the flaw?
- From: Sue...
- Re: Where is the flaw?
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Where is the flaw?
- From: PD
- Re: Where is the flaw?
- Prev by Date: Abbe George Lemaitre
- Next by Date: Re: Where is the flaw?
- Previous by thread: Abbe George Lemaitre
- Next by thread: Re: Where is the flaw?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|