Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: jem <xxx@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 09:12:06 -0400
kenseto wrote:
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qAPqg.29245$FR1.10109@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NGOqg.29244$FR1.13907@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
You are an idiot and a waste of time.
I'm agreeing with you, and that makes you think I'm an idiot? So what
do you suppose that says about you?
You need to find out why they will did
TWLS experiments and TWLS and OWLS isotopy experiments but refuse to do
direct OWLS experiments.
I don't need to find out why. I know why. Anybody with half a brain
knows why. In fact, everybody but you knows why. It's because when the
average number of eggs in two baskets is 10 and the same number of eggs
are in each basket, it isn't necessary to count the eggs to know that
each basket contains 10 of them.
Hey idiot.....how do you know what the average number of eggs in each
basket
is 10 without counting the number of eggs in each basket to figure out
the
average????
What difference does it make HOW I know? The point is that IF I know,
then counting them is redundant.
Hey idiot the point is that you don't know.
What do you think a test for one-way
isotropy is, Seto? Do you not realize that it's a test of the equality
of the speed of light in different directions?
I am walking isotropically in all directions does that mean that I am
walking at the speed of light? Do you realize that OWLS and TWLS can be
isotropic and can still have different values for light speed at different
distance of separation between the source and the detector??????????
And you think this happens because the light stops for lunch at the reflector? Have you done any research on experiments that measure reflective delays? If the delay time were significant then it *certainly* would have been factored out of the total round-trip time when TWLS was determined.
If you plan to critique experiments/measurements at this level of detail, then you have to find out how they were actually done. Otherwise you're just blowing smoke.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- References:
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: PD
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: jem
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: jem
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: jem
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: jem
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Prev by Date: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Next by Date: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Previous by thread: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Next by thread: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|