Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Jul 2006 06:20:59 -0700
kenseto wrote:
You don't need to measure light speed to 8 or 9 significant digits. You need
to perform experiments that give consistent results. As far as I can see
these older experiments using the direct method as specified by Einstein did
not give consistent results.
Which results do you claim are not consistent?
You really don't understand the concept of measurement
precision, do you? You think if I eyeball a distance as half
a mile and measure it to be 0.4 mile, that those are inconsistent
results?
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- References:
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: jem
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: PD
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- From: kenseto
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Prev by Date: Re: Classical electrodynamics, antigravity and MOND as predictions of GR.
- Next by Date: Marcel Luttgens - Persistent *** Eater
- Previous by thread: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Next by thread: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Index(es):