Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- From: castertroy14@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 15 Jul 2006 17:19:35 -0700
castertro...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear castertroy14:
<castertroy14@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152998823.899220.19100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear castertroy14:
<castertroy14@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152922791.949560.235820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
can anyone show me the process of getting
equation (2) from equation (1).
(1) D(mv / (1-v^2/c^2)^0.5)
(2) m(1 - v^2/c^2)^-1.5 Dv
I don't see how that relates to kinetic energy.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/relmom.html#c4
David A. Smith
K = integral(vDp) = integral(vD(mv / (1-v^2/c^2)^0.5))
D(mv / (1-v^2/c^2)^0.5) = m(1 - v^2/c^2)^-1.5 Dv
therefore
K = integral(m(1-v^2/c^2)^-1.5 vDv) = mc^2(1/(1-(v^2/c^2)^0.5 -
1)
so my question is how do you get from
D(mv / (1-v^2/c^2)^0.5) to m(1 - v^2/c^2)^-1.5 Dv
What text do you find this in? I have issues with the very
first:
K = integral(vDp)I think this should be:
K = integral(pDv)
David A. Smith
K = integral(fDs) = integral([Dp/Dt]Dx) = integral(vDp)
correction:
K = integral(fDx) = integral([Dp/Dt]Dx) = integral(vDp)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- References:
- derivation of kinetic energy
- From: castertroy14
- Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- From: castertroy14
- Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- From: castertroy14
- derivation of kinetic energy
- Prev by Date: Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- Next by Date: Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
- Previous by thread: Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- Next by thread: Re: derivation of kinetic energy
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|