sci.physics.relativity
- What is the first law of Universe ?,
socratus
- electroneuclear force,
frodo
- "The Right Angle Lever Paradox",
Toob
- Method of generating a Continuum: Propositon #3,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Birth of Universe, the continuum of space: PROPOSITION #2,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Birth of Universe, the seed and the shell: PROPOSITION #1,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- H.Munera - antiestablishment crank?,
rambus2005
- Even cranks get published,
rambus2005
- Chain Reactions Occuring Within An Equilibrium Of Entropy An Chaos,
CoreyWhite
- Moving Dimension Theory...:),
ny2292000
- GRAVITATION 101,
ny2292000
- 'Dynamic Units' (1 s = 3 10^8 m),
Peter Christensen
- Eisntein's Unified field theory using Newton Mechanics,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS,
e_erpelding@xxxxxxxxx
- About time,
Gert Baars
- universe dilation,
cantilever
- free energy,
cantilever
- A Symmetric Twins Conundrum,
xilog
- Twin Paradox,
guido
- Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed.,
ny2292000
- "The Paradox of Zeno",
Toob
- Re: On the prior Definition of the Meter and the Inaccuracies therein,
Sorcerer
- Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?,
Edward Green
- Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Igor
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sue...
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Mike
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sue...
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Igor
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Danny Dot
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Y.Porat
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
oriel36
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Mike
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
PD
And yet another...,
Edward Green
Another infantile question,
Edward Green
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Ofni
Gravity as spacetime curvature,
Juan R.
What is time?,
Gert Baars
- Re: What is time?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: What is time?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: What is time?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What is time?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: What is time?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is time?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: What is time?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is time?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
Barry
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: What is time?,
Juan R.
- Re: What is time?,
Sue...
- Re: What is time?,
kenseto
- Re: What is time?,
vergon
- Re: What is time?,
tomgee
- Re: What is time?,
Danny Dot
Acceleration and gravity,
Jensev
Relative speed and relative acceleration,
Henry Haapalainen
The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.,
Stamenin
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe",
Ofni
Manifolds in the nursery,
Edward Green
A NEW LOOK AT QM,
vergon
Re: Why NASA lost 700 boxes of moon landing video,
js
An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
FrediFizzx
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Sorcerer
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Sorcerer
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
oriel36
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Apology,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
John Park
PPN and alternative theories of gravity,
Juan R.
About the model of my universe,
duality
LORENTZ AND CPT VIOLATION,
mluttgens
"Retic Postings and SPAM",
Ofni
Question about new dark matter discovery,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Poincare conjecture,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
JanPB
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
JanPB
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Harry
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
There are many kooks in the SR kingdom,
mluttgens
OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- RE: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Martin Hogbin
Message not availableRe: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
Message not available
Message not available
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Ofni
Question about Hawking Radiation,
Joe Horrowitz
"A Snapshot of a Photon",
Ofni
Curvature scalar,
Ikke
Re: Curvature scalar,
Luca
Re: Any coordinate system in GR?,
G. L. Bradford
Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Spinning bodies at relativistic speeds - any pointers?,
Davo
Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?,
vps137
THE GALILEI'S PRINCIPLE OF THE RELATIVITY.,
Stamenin
"Weight vs. Mass"?,
Danny Dot
"Gravity",
Ofni
Doubt : Newton's Second Law,
WonderingWanderer
Message not available
Eternal Universe?,
mluttgens
THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
xxein
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
YBM
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
PD
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
kenseto
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sue...
"The Source of Gravitational Energy",
Gua
absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
Bill Hobba
- Re: absolute reference frame,
Tom Roberts
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
jem
- Re: absolute reference frame,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- <Possible follow-ups>
- absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
Lorenz gauge condition,
Peter Christensen
Schwarzschild questions,
I.Vecchi
A method to detect the preferred Lorentz frame (i.e. absolute frame),
gashan1971
Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions,
Danny Dot
Relativity?,
rahemanvelji
Galactic clusters,
dwhig265
"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?",
Gua
Absolute and Galolaian coordinate systems.,
Stamenin
John Anderson,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
relativity and tensor abstraction,
me
Photon bend another photon,
Danny Dot
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Bill Hobba
Re: Photon bend another photon,
The TimeLord
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Y.Porat
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
dlzc
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?,
francisr
"The Einstein Hoax",
Gua
c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vertvergon
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vergon
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
gehan_ameresekere
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Golden Boar
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sue...
- Cranks will always be ...Cranks,
rambus2005
Scientific proof of ether,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems",
Gua
Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
socratus
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Igor
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Idd E. Ott
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
PD
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
socratus
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Message not available
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Message not available
Re: the briliance og ouer professors,
Igor
Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2),
Koobee Wublee
Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
surrealistic-dream
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Harry
Analyse This!,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Re: Analyse This!,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
Igor
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
Igor
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Analyse This!,
Perdido
- Re: Analyse This!,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Analyse This!,
Perdido
- Re: Analyse This!,
Igor
Is superluminal communication possible?,
gashan1971
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?",
Gua
Corrected formula for ALPHA,
ivars . fabriciuss
The Proper understanding of Modern Physics.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS ARE UNABLE TO DESCRIBE THERELATIVISTIC DOPPLER EFFECT,
Bill Hobba
Socratus and Sorcerer,
Henry Haapalainen
Formula for alfa,
ivars . fabriciuss
The Michelson-Morley Experiment,
mluttgens
PoP10,
Peri of Pera
Proof time exists,
Gert Baars
Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
shevek
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
shevek
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
shevek
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
shevek
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
What is the formula of Nothing?,
socratus
"Do Virtual Photons Exist?",
Roloc
O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
TIME DILATION,
vertvergon
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Randy Poe
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sue...
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Stamenin
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Stamenin
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Stamenin
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
YBM
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
YBM
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
YBM
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
- Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
vertvergon
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
YBM
Re: TIME DILATION,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
vertvergon
Re: TIME DILATION,
Sorcerer
Re: TIME DILATION,
vertvergon
Re: TIME DILATION,
Peter Christensen
johnreed take 1A - modified August 8, 2006,
johnlawrencereedjr
How God Created the Universe,
kenseto
Calculate Your choroscope by substracting exactly 6 years from your birth. Just try it, then comment.,
ivars . fabriciuss
Wilczek's Aether,
shevek
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
vertvergon
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
shevek
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
shuba
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
shevek
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
shevek
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Sue...
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
shevek
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
shevek
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
shevek
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
vern
- Re: Wilczek's Aether,
kenseto
The law of conservation and transformation energy.,
socratus
"Evidence of the Existence of the Aether",
Roloc
World without Lorentz transforms wrong,
Josef Matz
Mistakes in relativity theories,
Henry Haapalainen
Relativistic Thinking.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
YBM
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
YBM
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
YBM
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
YBM
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
mluttgens
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Len Gaasenbeek
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Relativistic Thinking.,
surrealistic-dream
How can electron escape its infinity?,
socratus
"Corrections to Special Relativity",
Roloc
Experiment #2,
rAgAv
Interesting thread on sci.astro,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
"Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?",
Roloc
re-revised theory,
dwhig265
The mathematics and Quantum theory.,
socratus
i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D),
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D),
cmaj10
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D),
Sorcerer
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D),
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D),
Sorcerer
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D),
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D),
puppet_sock
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D),
Sorcerer
Wendy,
Sorcerer
brining natalie portman alive,
idatarm
the ultimate theory of everything,
idatarm
Updated theory.,
dwhig265
"The Flaw in High Energy Physics",
Roloc
Why is LET superior to SR?,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Josef Matz
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Harry
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Igor
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Pentcho Valev
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Igor
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
PD
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Josef Matz
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Josef Matz
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Josef Matz
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Igor
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Igor
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Igor
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
ivars . fabriciuss
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?,
Golden Boar
Yet Another Walkthrough Of The Twin Paradox, With Explicit Timepoints,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: A Wavelength/Frequency question,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
motion without force,
rAgAv
addition of velocities,
vertvergon
- Re: addition of velocities,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: addition of velocities,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: addition of velocities,
Igor
- Re: addition of velocities,
rambus2005
- Re: addition of velocities,
Harry
- Re: addition of velocities,
vertvergon
- Re: addition of velocities,
Harry
- Re: addition of velocities,
harry
- Re: addition of velocities,
Randy Poe
- Re: addition of velocities,
vertvergon
- Re: addition of velocities,
Randy Poe
- Re: addition of velocities,
vertvergon
- Re: addition of velocities,
Randy Poe
- Re: addition of velocities,
vertvergon
- Re: addition of velocities,
Harry
- Re: addition of velocities,
Paul B. Andersen
Sound waves,
rAgAv
"Measuring Our Absolute Velocity",
Etis
Hard SR questions?,
jt64
Squeezed TV transmissions from ship,
jt64
Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship,
Randy Poe
Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship,
Jon Bell
speed of light,
martin1703
The variant (invariance of light) paradox,
jt64
Re: Basic postulates of SR,
surrealistic-dream
PEER JOURNALS,
vertvergon
Androcles is there variant (invariance of light in SR)?,
jt64
My confusion with SR,
jt64
"Communicating at Translight Velocities",
Etis
The CMBR falsifies SR,
mluttgens
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Harry
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Josef Matz
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Igor
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
dwhig265
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Bill Hobba
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
dwhig265
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
dwhig265
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Randy Poe
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Randy Poe
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
cmaj10
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
PD
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Randy Poe
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Randy Poe
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
cmaj10
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
cmaj10
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
cmaj10
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
dlzc
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
cmaj10
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR,
cmaj10
gravitons,
prashanth
Playing with the units.,
jt64
Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Komlan
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
dda1
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sorcerer
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
PD
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sorcerer
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sorcerer
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
PD
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sorcerer
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
PD
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sorcerer
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
PD
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sorcerer
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Komlan
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
PD
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sorcerer
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
PD
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sorcerer
- Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity,
Sue...
Clock synch,
jt64
- Re: Clock synch,
Harry
- Re: Clock synch,
Sorcerer
- Re: Clock synch,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
jt64
- Re: Clock synch,
Sorcerer
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Clock synch,
jt64
- Re: Clock synch,
Harry
- Re: Clock synch,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Clock synch,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Clock synch,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Clock synch,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Clock synch,
jem
- Re: Clock synch,
jt64
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
kenseto
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
kenseto
- Re: Clock synch,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Clock synch,
kenseto
- Re: Clock synch,
jt64
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
kenseto
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
kenseto
- Re: Clock synch,
AllYou!
- Re: Clock synch,
kenseto
- Re: Clock synch,
AllYou!
- Re: Clock synch,
kenseto
- Re: Clock synch,
PD
- Re: Clock synch,
AllYou!
- Re: Clock synch,
kenseto
- Re: Clock synch,
PD
- Re: Clock synch,
AllYou!
- Re: Clock synch,
Sue...
- Re: Clock synch,
Barry
- Re: Clock synch,
Sue...
- Re: Clock synch,
guido
- Re: Clock synch,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Clock synch,
Barry
- Re: Clock synch,
Sue...
- Re: Clock synch,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Clock synch,
Sue...
Sergey Karavashkin, the PATENTED CRETIN is BAAACK!,
dda1
"The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics",
Etis
Fictional? SR experiment setup:,
jt64
the Lorentz transformation.,
Stamenin
Questions about cosmology,
denis . besak
"General Relativity Examined",
Etis
Re: POPPER, EINSTEIN AND INCONSISTENT THEORIES,
dda1
Detection of closed timelike curves,
Hunter
Fundamental weaknesses of SR.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
The Meaning of Material Existence.,
ny2292000
Re: Have Astronomy & Space Questions ? Ask The Astronomer !!,
nero
Physics world article on MOND and other alternate theories of gravity,
Melroy
Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.,
Nicolaas Vroom
Church the liar,
The Real Chris
Traversed distance thru time of observer equals measured local light speed?,
jt64
"Is There a Force of Gravity?",
Etis
Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
dwhig265
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
dwhig265
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
dwhig265
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
dwhig265
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
socratus
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
dwhig265
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
dwhig265
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
PD
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
PD
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
PD
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
PD
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
jt64
- Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?,
PD
English Translation of Ritz' 1908 Work (for John Kennaugh),
vern
"The Error in Relativistic Physics",
Eht
A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
David Thomson
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
dda1
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
shuba
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
FrediFizzx
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
David Thomson
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
dda1
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
David Thomson
- David Thomson, IMBECILE CRACKPOT,
dda1
- Jim Smithson aka (dda1), INTERNET FASCIST,
David Thomson
- David Thomson - Persistent CRETIN,
dda1
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
dda1
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
Igor
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
David Thomson
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
vern
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
David Thomson
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
vern
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
David Thomson
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
vern
- Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics,
David Thomson
Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.,
St.M
Re: EINSTEIN, NEWTON AND 2+2=5,
Sorcerer
COLLIDER FOLLY,
vertvergon
A Million Miles a Day,
Monty
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Eht
Scientific proof of God is possible.,
socratus
Your Message In An Atomic Explosion,
Sign Generator
Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything,
ny2292000
Re: Physics is dead!,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
Is motion absolute?,
udegenbaev
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Harry
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
kenseto
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
mluttgens
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Russell
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
mluttgens
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Russell
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
mluttgens
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Harry
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
AllYou!
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
AllYou!
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
AllYou!
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Harry
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Harry
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
AllYou!
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Harry
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
mluttgens
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
mluttgens
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
mluttgens
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
mluttgens
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
AllYou!
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
AllYou!
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
AllYou!
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
PD
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
tomgee
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
AllYou!
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Harry
- Re: Is motion absolute?,
Ulan
Re: Understanding quantum mechnanics,
xxein
Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe",
JanPB
THE MODERN PHYSICIST,
vertvergon
Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
dda1
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
dda1
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
dda1
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
dda1
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
shuba
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
shuba
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
vern
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Message not available
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Message not available
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Randy Poe
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
Re: Evidences for the ether,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
Re: Evidences for the ether,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
Re: Evidences for the ether,
shuba
Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- KOOKFIGHT,
dda1
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- KOOKFIGHT!,
dda1
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
David Thomson
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
PD
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
yinbing-zhou
A new mechanism of Higgs in producing charge particles,
فیزیک
THE DEAD END,
vertvergon
FREE,
pauljnelson
What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
socratus
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
vertvergon
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
socratus
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
socratus
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
socratus
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Golden Boar
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Golden Boar
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
socratus
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Gua
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Danny Dot
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Danny Dot
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Peter Christensen
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
socratus
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
socratus
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?,
socratus
Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism".,
shuba
Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2",
vertvergon
"The Properties of the Aether",
Eht
Re: P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?,
Peter Christensen
Re: SR F.O.P.I,
Peri of Pera
Re: The phrase 'dark matter',
The TimeLord
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
- Message not available
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
- Message not available
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Phineas T PuddleDuck
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
jem
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Message not availableRe: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Sorcerer
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Jerry
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.,
The Ghost In The Machine
A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity,
mluttgens
"Dimensional Analysis and Relativity",
Eht
Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism",
surrealistic-dream
Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?,
Osidog
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
cafeinst
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
xxein
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
xxein
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Russell
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Russell
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Message not available
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Russell
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Russell
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Message not available
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Message not available
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Message not available
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
- Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
Message not availableRe: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ken S. Tucker
Message not availableRe: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Ilja Schmelzer
Message not availableRe: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
LEJ Brouwer
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Daryl McCullough
Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
JanPB
Message not availableRe: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?,
Tom Roberts
