sci.physics.relativity
- What is the first law of Universe ?,
socratus
- electroneuclear force,
frodo
- "The Right Angle Lever Paradox",
Toob
- Method of generating a Continuum: Propositon #3,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Birth of Universe, the continuum of space: PROPOSITION #2,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Birth of Universe, the seed and the shell: PROPOSITION #1,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- H.Munera - antiestablishment crank?,
rambus2005
- Even cranks get published,
rambus2005
- Chain Reactions Occuring Within An Equilibrium Of Entropy An Chaos,
CoreyWhite
- Moving Dimension Theory...:),
ny2292000
- GRAVITATION 101,
ny2292000
- 'Dynamic Units' (1 s = 3 10^8 m),
Peter Christensen
- Eisntein's Unified field theory using Newton Mechanics,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
- The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS,
e_erpelding@xxxxxxxxx
- About time,
Gert Baars
- universe dilation,
cantilever
- free energy,
cantilever
- A Symmetric Twins Conundrum,
xilog
- Twin Paradox,
guido
- Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed.,
ny2292000
- "The Paradox of Zeno",
Toob
- Re: On the prior Definition of the Meter and the Inaccuracies therein,
Sorcerer
- Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?,
Edward Green
- Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Igor
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sue...
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Mike
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sue...
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Igor
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Danny Dot
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Y.Porat
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Martin Hogbin
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Sorcerer
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
oriel36
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Mike
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
PD
And yet another...,
Edward Green
Another infantile question,
Edward Green
A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Ofni
Gravity as spacetime curvature,
Juan R.
What is time?,
Gert Baars
- Re: What is time?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: What is time?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: What is time?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: What is time?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: What is time?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is time?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: What is time?,
Y.Porat
- Re: What is time?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
Barry
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: What is time?,
Sorcerer
- Re: What is time?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: What is time?,
Juan R.
- Re: What is time?,
Sue...
- Re: What is time?,
kenseto
- Re: What is time?,
vergon
- Re: What is time?,
tomgee
- Re: What is time?,
Danny Dot
Acceleration and gravity,
Jensev
Relative speed and relative acceleration,
Henry Haapalainen
The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.,
Stamenin
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe",
Ofni
Manifolds in the nursery,
Edward Green
A NEW LOOK AT QM,
vergon
Re: Why NASA lost 700 boxes of moon landing video,
js
An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
FrediFizzx
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Sorcerer
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Sorcerer
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
oriel36
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Apology,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
rambus2005
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result,
John Park
PPN and alternative theories of gravity,
Juan R.
About the model of my universe,
duality
LORENTZ AND CPT VIOLATION,
mluttgens
"Retic Postings and SPAM",
Ofni
Question about new dark matter discovery,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Poincare conjecture,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
JanPB
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
JanPB
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
carlip-nospam
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
Harry
- Re: Poincare conjecture,
oriel36
There are many kooks in the SR kingdom,
mluttgens
OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- RE: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Martin Hogbin
Message not availableRe: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
Message not available
Message not available
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Ofni
Question about Hawking Radiation,
Joe Horrowitz
"A Snapshot of a Photon",
Ofni
Curvature scalar,
Ikke
Re: Curvature scalar,
Luca
Re: Any coordinate system in GR?,
G. L. Bradford
Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Spinning bodies at relativistic speeds - any pointers?,
Davo
Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?,
vps137
THE GALILEI'S PRINCIPLE OF THE RELATIVITY.,
Stamenin
"Weight vs. Mass"?,
Danny Dot
"Gravity",
Ofni
Doubt : Newton's Second Law,
WonderingWanderer
Message not available
Eternal Universe?,
mluttgens
THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
xxein
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
YBM
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
THE_ONE
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
PD
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
kenseto
- Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP,
Sue...
"The Source of Gravitational Energy",
Gua
absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
Bill Hobba
- Re: absolute reference frame,
Tom Roberts
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- Re: absolute reference frame,
PD
- Re: absolute reference frame,
jem
- Re: absolute reference frame,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- <Possible follow-ups>
- absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
- absolute reference frame,
dwhig265
Lorenz gauge condition,
Peter Christensen
Schwarzschild questions,
I.Vecchi
A method to detect the preferred Lorentz frame (i.e. absolute frame),
gashan1971
Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions,
Danny Dot
Relativity?,
rahemanvelji
Galactic clusters,
dwhig265
"Will the LIGO Experiment Work?",
Gua
Absolute and Galolaian coordinate systems.,
Stamenin
John Anderson,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
relativity and tensor abstraction,
me
Photon bend another photon,
Danny Dot
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Bill Hobba
Re: Photon bend another photon,
The TimeLord
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Y.Porat
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
dlzc
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Randy M. Dumse
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
- Re: Photon bend another photon,
rambus2005
Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?,
francisr
"The Einstein Hoax",
Gua
c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vertvergon
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vergon
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
shuba
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
John C . Polasek
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
gehan_ameresekere
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Golden Boar
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
G
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Peri of Pera
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sorcerer
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
vps137
- Re: c+v and c-v or not?,
Sue...
- Cranks will always be ...Cranks,
rambus2005
Scientific proof of ether,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
"The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems",
Gua
Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
socratus
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Randy Poe
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Igor
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Idd E. Ott
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
PD
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
socratus
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Message not available
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Message not available
Re: the briliance og ouer professors,
Igor
Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2),
Koobee Wublee
Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
surrealistic-dream
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism",
Harry
Analyse This!,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Re: Analyse This!,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
Igor
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
Igor
- Re: Analyse This!,
me
- Re: Analyse This!,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Analyse This!,
Perdido
- Re: Analyse This!,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Analyse This!,
Perdido
- Re: Analyse This!,
Igor
Is superluminal communication possible?,
gashan1971
"Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?",
Gua
Corrected formula for ALPHA,
ivars . fabriciuss
The Proper understanding of Modern Physics.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS ARE UNABLE TO DESCRIBE THERELATIVISTIC DOPPLER EFFECT,
Bill Hobba
Socratus and Sorcerer,
Henry Haapalainen
Formula for alfa,
ivars . fabriciuss
The Michelson-Morley Experiment,
mluttgens
PoP10,
Peri of Pera
Proof time exists,
Gert Baars
Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Sorcerer
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS,