sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: electroneuclear force
  • From: PD
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page (was: What become...)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Cranks will always be ...Cranks
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Cranks will always be ...Cranks
  • From: Harry
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• electroneuclear force
  • From: frodo
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: About time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: guido
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sue...
• Cranks will always be ...Cranks
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: H.Munera - antiestablishment crank?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Toob
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: oriel36
• Method of generating a Continuum: Propositon #3
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Harry
• Re: H.Munera - antiestablishment crank?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: shuba
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: About time
  • From: lebel
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: vps137
• Re: About time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: About time
  • From: lebel
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Chain Reactions Occuring Within An Equilibrium Of Entropy An Chaos
  • From: xxein
• Re: About time
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Birth of Universe, the seed and the shell: PROPOSITION #1
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Chain Reactions Occuring Within An Equilibrium Of Entropy An Chaos
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: About time
  • From: lebel
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: H.Munera - antiestablishment crank?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: e_erpelding
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: oriel36
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: rambus2005
• Apology
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: oriel36
• Birth of Universe, the continuum of space: PROPOSITION #2
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: H.Munera - antiestablishment crank?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Birth of Universe, the seed and the shell: PROPOSITION #1
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• H.Munera - antiestablishment crank?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Even cranks get published
  • From: rambus2005
• Chain Reactions Occuring Within An Equilibrium Of Entropy An Chaos
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 'Dynamic Units' (1 s = 3 10^8 m)
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Mike
• Re: 'Dynamic Units' (1 s = 3 10^8 m)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: 'Dynamic Units' (1 s = 3 10^8 m)
  • From: Harry
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: e_erpelding
• Re: About time
  • From: mluttgens
• The Rotating Disk
  • From: e_erpelding@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Moving Dimension Theory...:)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: About time
  • From: GSS
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: About time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: 'Dynamic Units' (1 s = 3 10^8 m)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Moving Dimension Theory...:)
  • From: ny2292000
• GRAVITATION 101
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• 'Dynamic Units' (1 s = 3 10^8 m)
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Harry
• Re: About time
  • From: BernardZ
• Eisntein's Unified field theory using Newton Mechanics
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: G
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: G
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: vps137
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: About time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: e_erpelding@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The democratic kind of metric
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: vps137
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: shuba
• The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: e_erpelding@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The democratic kind of metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: About time
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: About time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: About time
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: About time
  • From: vergon
• Re: About time
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: About time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: About time
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: About time
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• The democratic kind of metric
  • From: Edward Green
• About time
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: shuba
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: free energy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: free energy
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: universe dilation
  • From: cantilever
• universe dilation
  • From: cantilever
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Russell
• free energy
  • From: cantilever
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Russell
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: guido
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Russell
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Twin Paradox
  • From: guido
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Ofni
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed.
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Harry
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: vps137
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: vps137
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: G
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: What is time?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: socratus
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: vps137
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Barry
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: xxein
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Igor
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: And yet another...
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: On the prior Definition of the Meter and the Inaccuracies therein
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On the prior Definition of the Meter and the Inaccuracies therein
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Acceleration and gravity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Toob
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: G
• Re: On the prior Definition of the Meter and the Inaccuracies therein
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: G
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What is time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: What is time?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: And yet another...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: angi
• Re: Another infantile question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Another infantile question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Another infantile question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: And yet another...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: angi
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: guido
• Re: What is time?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: And yet another...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Igor
• Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• And yet another...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Another infantile question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Manifolds in the nursery
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: What is time?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: socratus
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: socratus
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: socratus
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravity as spacetime curvature
  • From: Ofni
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Ofni
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Gravity as spacetime curvature
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Acceleration and gravity
  • From: Jensev
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• RE-Experiment #2
  • From: rAgAv
• RE-Experiment #2
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is time?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: What is time?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: Manifolds in the nursery
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Acceleration and gravity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Relative speed and relative acceleration
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Acceleration and gravity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relative speed and relative acceleration
  • From: xxein
• What is time?
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: Manifolds in the nursery
  • From: Edward Green
• Acceleration and gravity
  • From: Jensev
• Relative speed and relative acceleration
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: Golden Helmet
• The inertial forces and the law of conservation of the energy.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Manifolds in the nursery
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: John Park
• Re: Manifolds in the nursery
  • From: GSS
• Re: Question about Hawking Radiation
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Manifolds in the nursery
  • From: JanPB
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question about Hawking Radiation
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Manifolds in the nursery
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Ofni
• Manifolds in the nursery
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Lorenz gauge condition
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A NEW LOOK AT QM
  • From: vergon
• Re: A NEW LOOK AT QM
  • From: vergon
• Re: A NEW LOOK AT QM
  • From: vergon
• Re: A NEW LOOK AT QM
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: Golden Helmet
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A NEW LOOK AT QM
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• A NEW LOOK AT QM
  • From: vergon
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Why NASA lost 700 boxes of moon landing video
  • From: js
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Ofni
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Sergey Karavashkin
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: FrediFizzx
• An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: vps137
• Re: PPN and alternative theories of gravity
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Question about new dark matter discovery
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Barry
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• PPN and alternative theories of gravity
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: LORENTZ AND CPT VIOLATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LORENTZ AND CPT VIOLATION
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??
  • From: dlzc
• About the model of my universe
  • From: duality
• Re: LORENTZ AND CPT VIOLATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• LORENTZ AND CPT VIOLATION
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: socratus
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Ofni
• Re: Question about new dark matter discovery
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Question about new dark matter discovery
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Poincare conjecture
  • From: JanPB
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Danny Dot
• Poincare conjecture
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: vps137
• Einstein - idolized by the media
  • From: peterbillc777
• Re: There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: socratus
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: PD
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• RE: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Question about Hawking Radiation
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: shevek
• Re: There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• There are many kooks in the SR kingdom
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Ikke
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Ofni
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: vps137
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: vps137
• Re: Spinning bodies at relativistic speeds - any pointers?
  • From: Davo
• Re: Question about Hawking Radiation
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: vps137
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: xxein
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Question about Hawking Radiation
  • From: Joe Horrowitz
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: shevek
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Ikke
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Ikke
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Luca
• absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: dlzc
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: YBM
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: YBM
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: jem
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: kenseto
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Ofni
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Curvature scalar
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Curvature scalar
  • From: Ikke
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??
  • From: David . Paterson
• Re: Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??
  • From: PD
• Re: Any coordinate system in GR?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Why can't dark matter be very distant planets??
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Spinning bodies at relativistic speeds - any pointers?
  • From: Davo
• Re: Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Is the Lorentz transformation a simple rotation of coordinate system?
  • From: vps137
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: xxein
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: xxein
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: Danny Dot
• THE GALILEI'S PRINCIPLE OF THE RELATIVITY.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: Golden Helmet
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: PD
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: PD
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: PD
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: PD
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: vergon
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: PD
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: YBM
• Re: John Anderson
  • From: dlzc
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: shevek
• "Gravity"
  • From: Ofni
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: PD
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Harry
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: Harry
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: THE_ONE
• Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: WonderingWanderer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: xxein
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Eternal Universe?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: YBM
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Eternal Universe?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: Sorcerer
• THE SAGNAC LOOP
  • From: THE_ONE
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Gua
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: JanPB
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: the briliance og ouer professors
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• absolute reference frame
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Relativity?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: YBM
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorenz gauge condition
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativity?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Schwarzschild questions
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: John Anderson
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: fritzius@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Proper understanding of Modern Physics.
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The Proper understanding of Modern Physics.
  • From: jem
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Lorenz gauge condition
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: socratus
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Sorcerer
• Schwarzschild questions
  • From: I.Vecchi
• A method to detect the preferred Lorentz frame (i.e. absolute frame)
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?
  • From: Quantum Ranger
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Relativity?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Proper understanding of Modern Physics.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Relativity?
  • From: xxein
• Re: relativity and tensor abstraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: John Anderson
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Relativity and Maxwell's eqautions
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Relativity?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Relativity?
  • From: rahemanvelji
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Perdido
• Re: Absolute and Galolaian coordinate systems.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: shuba
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Absolute and Galolaian coordinate systems.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Absolute and Galolaian coordinate systems.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Perdido
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Perdido
• Re: Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?
  • From: Perdido
• Re: relativity and tensor abstraction
  • From: Perdido
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Galactic clusters
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: YBM
• Galactic clusters
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: relativity and tensor abstraction
  • From: Igor
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Scientific proof of ether
  • From: dwhig265
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Gua
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Absolute and Galolaian coordinate systems.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: PD
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?
  • From: PD
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity and tensor abstraction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: gehan_ameresekere
• Re: Calculate Your choroscope by substracting exactly 6 years from your birth. Just try it, then comment.
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: relativity and tensor abstraction
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: shuba
• Absolute and Galolaian coordinate systems.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Cosmik Debris
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• John Anderson
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Scientific proof of ether
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• relativity and tensor abstraction
  • From: me
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: kenseto
• Photon bend another photon
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Scientific proof of ether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Scientific proof of ether
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Do quantum physics support or make possible the notion of subjective reality?
  • From: francisr
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Is superluminal communication possible?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: vergon
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: vergon
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Scientific proof of ether
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Gua
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Gua
• Re: Wendy
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Sorcerer
• c+v and c-v or not?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Scientific proof of ether
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: shuba
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: xxein
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: me
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shevek
• Re: johnreed take 1A - modified August 8, 2006
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: shevek
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Idd E. Ott
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: me
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: kenseto
• Re: the briliance og ouer professors
  • From: me
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Gua
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Very simple question: What is the specific formula of the electron ( not a symbol)?
  • From: socratus
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: socratus
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: shevek
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Is superluminal communication possible?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: the briliance og ouer professors
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is superluminal communication possible?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: me
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the briliance og ouer professors
  • From: Igor
• Re: Analyse This!
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is superluminal communication possible?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Einsteim Fudged (E = m c^2)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Solutions to Vacuum Einstein Tensor
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: shevek
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Barry
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: kenseto
• Analyse This!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Is superluminal communication possible?
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Gua
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Socratus and Sorcerer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Socratus and Sorcerer
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Hunter
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: PD
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Socratus and Sorcerer
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: vps137
• Re: LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS ARE UNABLE TO DESCRIBE THERELATIVISTIC DOPPLER EFFECT
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: cmaj10
• Corrected formula for ALPHA
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Formula for alfa
  • From: Golden Helmet
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Golden Helmet
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: socratus
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sue...
• The Proper understanding of Modern Physics.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Barry
• Re: LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS ARE UNABLE TO DESCRIBE THERELATIVISTIC DOPPLER EFFECT
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Barry
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: PD
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Socratus and Sorcerer
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Formula for alfa
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS ARE UNABLE TO DESCRIBE THERELATIVISTIC DOPPLER EFFECT
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: PD
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS ARE UNABLE TO DESCRIBE THERELATIVISTIC DOPPLER EFFECT
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Sue...
• Re: LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS ARE UNABLE TO DESCRIBE THERELATIVISTIC DOPPLER EFFECT
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS ARE UNABLE TO DESCRIBE THERELATIVISTIC DOPPLER EFFECT
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Barry
• Re: PoP10
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jem
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: kenseto
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The law of conservation and transformation energy.
  • From: socratus
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: socratus
• The Michelson-Morley Experiment
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: PoP10
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• PoP10
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Proof time exists
  • From: vertvergon
• Proof time exists
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: xxein
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: kunzmilan
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: YBM
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: How God Created the Universe
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• What is the formula of Nothing?
  • From: socratus
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Yet Another Walkthrough Of The Twin Paradox, With Explicit Timepoints
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: johnreed take 1A - modified August 8, 2006
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Roloc
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Roloc
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shuba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: YBM
• Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: johnreed take 1A - modified August 8, 2006
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Sue...
• Re: TIME DILATION
  • From: Randy Poe
• O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• TIME DILATION
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• johnreed take 1A - modified August 8, 2006
  • From: johnlawrencereedjr
• Re: How God Created the Universe
  • From: YBM
• Re: How God Created the Universe
  • From: PD
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Calculate Your choroscope by substracting exactly 6 years from your birth. Just try it, then comment.
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Hunter
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: YBM
• How God Created the Universe
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: vern
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Calculate Your choroscope by substracting exactly 6 years from your birth. Just try it, then comment.
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Harry
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Calculate Your choroscope by substracting exactly 6 years from your birth. Just try it, then comment.
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: How can electron escape its infinity?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The law of conservation and transformation energy.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The law of conservation and transformation energy.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Wilczek's Aether
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Wilczek's Aether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Mistakes in relativity theories
  • From: Igor
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: re-revised theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Mistakes in relativity theories
  • From: PD
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: re-revised theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The law of conservation and transformation energy.
  • From: PD
• Re: re-revised theory
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: The law of conservation and transformation energy.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: How can electron escape its infinity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• The law of conservation and transformation energy.
  • From: socratus
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Roloc
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Mistakes in relativity theories
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: World without Lorentz transforms wrong
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: World without Lorentz transforms wrong
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: How can electron escape its infinity?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The art and logic of theory invention in physics
  • From: YBM
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: YBM
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How can electron escape its infinity?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: World without Lorentz transforms wrong
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: re-revised theory
  • From: dwhig265
• World without Lorentz transforms wrong
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Mistakes in relativity theories
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• Relativistic Thinking.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The art and logic of theory invention in physics
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The art and logic of theory invention in physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Experiment #2
  • From: Igor
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• Re: How can electron escape its infinity?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: The art and logic of theory invention in physics
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• The art and logic of theory invention in physics
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• How can electron escape its infinity?
  • From: socratus
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Roloc
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Roloc
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Sue...
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Experiment #2
  • From: Sue...
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Experiment #2
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Harry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Interesting thread on sci.astro
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: brining natalie portman alive
  • From: xxein
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T PuddleDuck
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Phineas T PuddleDuck
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shuba
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Phineas T PuddleDuck
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?"
  • From: Roloc
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Igor
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: YBM
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Igor
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: re-revised theory
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: re-revised theory
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• re-revised theory
  • From: dwhig265
• The mathematics and Quantum theory.
  • From: socratus
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: cmaj10
• i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: brining natalie portman alive
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Wendy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Wendy
  • From: Sorcerer
• brining natalie portman alive
  • From: idatarm
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• the ultimate theory of everything
  • From: idatarm
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Phineas T PuddleDuck
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Updated theory.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: harry
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: YBM
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Phineas T PuddleDuck
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Why is LET superior to SR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why is LET superior to SR?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why is LET superior to SR?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Updated theory.
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Harry
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Igor
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Harry
• Re: Why is LET superior to SR?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• "The Flaw in High Energy Physics"
  • From: Roloc
• Why is LET superior to SR?
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: A Wavelength/Frequency question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Phineas T PuddleDuck
• Re: motion without force
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A Wavelength/Frequency question
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Yet Another Walkthrough Of The Twin Paradox, With Explicit Timepoints
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Harry
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Harry
• Re: Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Do photons take part in gravity ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Yet Another Walkthrough Of The Twin Paradox, With Explicit Timepoints
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Wavelength/Frequency question
  • From: rockie2323
• Re: A Wavelength/Frequency question
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Wavelength/Frequency question
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: motion without force
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: motion without force
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: motion without force
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: motion without force
  • From: Ned
• Re: motion without force
  • From: atomik . fungus
• Re: motion without force
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Sound waves
  • From: Igor
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Igor
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• motion without force
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: addition of velocities
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• addition of velocities
  • From: vertvergon
• Sound waves
  • From: rAgAv
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "Measuring Our Absolute Velocity"
  • From: Etis
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Hard SR questions?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Hard SR questions?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: jt64
• Re: Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: jt64
• Squeezed TV transmissions from ship
  • From: jt64
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: gravitons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Androcles is there variant (invariance of light in SR)?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: vern
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: speed of light
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: speed of light
  • From: martin1703
• Re: Androcles is there variant (invariance of light in SR)?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• speed of light
  • From: martin1703
• Re: Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: St.M
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: gravitons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sue...
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The variant (invariance of light) paradox
  • From: xxein
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: dej4
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The variant (invariance of light) paradox
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Androcles is there variant (invariance of light in SR)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Androcles is there variant (invariance of light in SR)?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Androcles is there variant (invariance of light in SR)?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Vertigo Vergon - CRETIN
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Vertigo Vergon - CRETIN
  • From: dda1
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Ulan
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Igor
• Re: The variant (invariance of light) paradox
  • From: jt64
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: Igor
• Re: PEER JOURNALS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The variant (invariance of light) paradox
  • From: jt64
• The variant (invariance of light) paradox
  • From: jt64
• Re: Basic postulates of SR
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• PEER JOURNALS
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Androcles is there variant (invariance of light in SR)?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: jt64
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Androcles is there variant (invariance of light in SR)?
  • From: jt64
• Re: My confusion with SR
  • From: jt64
• Re: My confusion with SR
  • From: jt64
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• My confusion with SR
  • From: jt64
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: jt64
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: jt64
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: jt64
• "Communicating at Translight Velocities"
  • From: Etis
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: jt64
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Harry
• Re: Playing with the units.
  • From: Harry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Harry
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: PD
• The CMBR falsifies SR
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: Harry
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: Harry
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Harry
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sorcerer
• gravitons
  • From: prashanth
• Playing with the units.
  • From: jt64
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: jt64
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: Harry
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: Harry
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Harry
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: jt64
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Komlan
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: dda1
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Komlan
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: dda1
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything
  • From: ny2292000
• Cosmic speed limit and special relativity
  • From: Komlan
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: shevek
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything
  • From: shevek
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything
  • From: shevek
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shevek
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: jt64
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Igor
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: jt64
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Questions about cosmology
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: jt64
• Re: Clock synch
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: Harry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Clock synch
  • From: jt64
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• KOOKFIGHT!
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Sergey Karavashkin, the PATENTED CRETIN is BAAACK!
  • From: dda1
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• "The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics"
  • From: Etis
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: vern
• Re: Questions about cosmology
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: jt64
• Fictional? SR experiment setup:
  • From: jt64
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• the Lorentz transformation.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: vern
• Re: Questions about cosmology
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Questions about cosmology
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: Questions about cosmology
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: shuba
• KOOKFIGHT
  • From: dda1
• KOOKFIGHT
  • From: dda1
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Questions about cosmology
  • From: denis . besak
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: vertvergon
• "General Relativity Examined"
  • From: Etis
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: POPPER, EINSTEIN AND INCONSISTENT THEORIES
  • From: dda1
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Harry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: vern
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Gerald L. O'Barr - Persistent CRETIN
  • From: dda1
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: PD
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: PD
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Have Astronomy & Space Questions ? Ask The Astronomer !!
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: xxein
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Detection of closed timelike curves
  • From: Hunter
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Fundamental weaknesses of SR.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: St.M
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Sorcerer
• The Meaning of Material Existence.
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Traversed distance thru time of observer equals measured local light speed?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: shuba
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Have Astronomy & Space Questions ? Ask The Astronomer !!
  • From: nero
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Physics world article on MOND and other alternate theories of gravity
  • From: Melroy
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Understanding SR - simultaneity and Lorentz contraction.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Church the liar
  • From: The Real Chris
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Traversed distance thru time of observer equals measured local light speed?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: St.M
• Re: Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: St.M
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• David Thomson - Persistent CRETIN
  • From: dda1
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: vertvergon
• Jim Smithson aka (dda1), INTERNET FASCIST
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jem
• David Thomson, IMBECILE CRACKPOT
  • From: dda1
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jem
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Etis
• Re: Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Frame dependent distances in relativity?
  • From: jt64
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: Plastic Oracle
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• English Translation of Ritz' 1908 Work (for John Kennaugh)
  • From: vern
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shuba
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: shuba
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: shuba
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: EINSTEIN, NEWTON AND 2+2=5
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: shuba
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: David Thomson, persitent shit pusher
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Scientific proof of God is possible.
  • From: Igor
• Re: EINSTEIN, NEWTON AND 2+2=5
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: David Thomson, persitent shit pusher
  • From: dda1
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: shuba
• Re: David Thomson, persitent shit pusher
  • From: David Thomson
• David Thomson, persitent shit pusher
  • From: dda1
• Re: Scientific proof of God is possible.
  • From: Gary Eickmeier
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: David Thomson
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Eht
• Re: A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: dda1
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: dda1
• A "Lose-Lose Theorem" Challenges the Standard Model of Physics
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: dda1
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: dda1
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Santa Claus, on the other hand, is real.
  • From: St.M
• Re: EINSTEIN, NEWTON AND 2+2=5
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: EINSTEIN, NEWTON AND 2+2=5
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: COLLIDER FOLLY
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Scientific proof of God is possible.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: COLLIDER FOLLY
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: COLLIDER FOLLY
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Million Miles a Day
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: A Million Miles a Day
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• COLLIDER FOLLY
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Scientific proof of God is possible.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: dda1
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: David Thomson
• A Million Miles a Day
  • From: Monty
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: jem
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: jem
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: socratus
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: jem
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Eht
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Eht
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Scientific proof of God is possible.
  • From: socratus
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: socratus
• Your Message In An Atomic Explosion
  • From: Sign Generator
• Re: Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR F.O.P.I
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: SR F.O.P.I
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: socratus
• Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Understanding quantum mechnanics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: xxein
• Re: Understanding quantum mechnanics
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Physics is dead!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is motion absolute?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Is motion absolute?
  • From: udegenbaev
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: Harry
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Russell
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: JanPB
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: xxein
• Re: Understanding quantum mechnanics
  • From: xxein
• Re: "What Special and General Relativity Tell Us About the Nature of Our Universe"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Russell
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: Harry
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• THE MODERN PHYSICIST
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism".
  • From: John Park
• Evidences for the ether
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• A new mechanism of Higgs in producing charge particles
  • From: فیزیک
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE DEAD END
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• THE DEAD END
  • From: vertvergon
• FREE
  • From: pauljnelson
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: cafeinst
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: Igor
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: socratus
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: socratus
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• What is the Einstein formula E=Mc^2?
  • From: socratus
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: schoenfeld1
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: jem
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: jem
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: SR F.O.P.I
  • From: Harry
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: isaacinspace
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: isaacinspace
• Re: SR F.O.P.I
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: SR F.O.P.I
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein, E=m(c^2), and charges of "plagiarism".
  • From: shuba
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: Igor
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: vertvergon
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: Harry
• Re: "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Eht
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: P = m*V = (E/c,p) ?
  • From: Peter Christensen
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: SR F.O.P.I
  • From: harry
• Re: SR F.O.P.I
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: The phrase 'dark matter'
  • From: The TimeLord
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: xxein
• Re: A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: Igor
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
  • From: Sorcerer
• A Critical Analysis of Special Relativity
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: goodbyeblueskye
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Eht
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: jem
• Re: Is there a theory or formula that "explains" the universe?
  • From: Osidog
• Re: Misinterpretation of the radial parameter in the Schwarzschild solution?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer