Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.

Sorcerer wrote:
"Jerry" <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1154352267.460071.295550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

| The Chandra data cannot be dismissed.

I'm not dismissing any data. The Lowell data cannot be dismissed.
http://ltpwww.gsfc.nasa.gov/tharsis/canals.html

What are they seeing, if not a canal dug out by highly intelligent
red Martian lobsters and helped by bright green flying elephants
with a civilization more advanced than ours? It pretty obvious
that if we dug canals before we had railways the Martians would
have done the same.

We are discussing electronically gathered data, not
subjective visual interpretations.

The Chandra data cannot be dismissed. It shows an
X-ray bright body whose estimated orbital parameters
are the same as the orbital parameters of the secondary
visible light body which shows up in optical spectra
(except for being "pulled in" a little).


| What are they measuring, if not an X-ray bright secondary which
| recedes then the primary is advancing, and advances when the
| primary is receding?

They are seeing X-rays that are faster than visible light, from a
single source.
I mean, c'mon, a "dark star" that is brighter at higher frequencies?
Haven't you ever heard of the Rayleigh-Jeans law?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rayleigh-Jeans_law

X-rays are emitted by the corona, which has a temperature
of millions of degrees.

Visible light is emitted by the photosphere.

|
| READ THE PAPER.
|

No. LEARN PHYSICS. I'm not interested in supposition, if a
star emits X-rays it is hot.

The corona is hot.

The Sun's corona has a temperature of about 2 million degrees,
much hotter than the photosphere.

The Sun is an X-ray emitter. Only 1/1000 as bright as
Algol B, but it still emits.

X-rays were first produced from
cathode ray tubes by RAISING the anode voltage. Algol is hot,
and it is NOT occulted.

If X-radiation is faster than visible light then it will arrive here out
of phase with the visible light, and it can still be in phase with IR.

The X-rays are in phase with the optical spectrum of the
secondary, which has been resolved from that of the primary.

Haven't you heard of racing cars being lapped?
If you can't see the whole race the winner is first over the line,
even if it completed 1 lap less than the car following.

_____) _____) _____) _____) _____) _____) _____) IR
_______|_______|_______|_______|_______|_______| Visible
__________!__________!__________!__________! UV

Algol <--------------------------x-------------------------------->Earth

The race between UV photons, IR photons and visible photons
is continuous and you can't know during which lap they left Algol.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wendy/Wendy.gif
This whole concept of one speed only is totally ridiculous, based on
aether.

Except that this hypothesis matches observed fact.

How come you have a deeper secondary minimum in IR
in this obviously contrived chart that YOU referred to?
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algolagain.JPG
The dark star emits more UV and more IR than visible light?
NONSENSE! It's another Martian canal, seeing things that are not there.
You are hallucinating. You are not alone, there are many just as
crazy as you. Andersen wants the B8 star eclipsed by a K2 accretion
disk. He's totally cuckoo, like all dumb relativists and aetherialists.
"But the two stars of Algol have different mass, radius and density, and the
B8 is well outside of the Roche limit of the K2, while the K2 is just at the
Roche limit of the B8. That is, the K2 fills its Roche lobe completely, and
mass is transferred to the B8. So the K2 IS torn apart and there is an
accretion disk around the B8 akin to the rings of Saturn. (This accretion
disk is not stable, though. It is a transient disk; the mass transferred
from the K2 bounces off the surface of the B8 and eventually falls back to
the surface.) "- Andersen

Jerry

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... I mean, c'mon, a "dark star" that is brighter at higher frequencies? ... star emits X-rays it is hot. ... If X-radiation is faster than visible light then it will arrive here out ... accretion disk around the B8 akin to the rings of Saturn. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... |> I'm not dismissing any data. ... | visible light body which shows up in optical spectra ... | X-rays are emitted by the corona, ... is a full magnitude less bright than Algol, but it is bigger and it ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... |> I'm not dismissing any data. ... | visible light body which shows up in optical spectra ... | X-rays are emitted by the corona, ... is a full magnitude less bright than Algol, but it is bigger and it ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Your own personal black hole?
    ... than visible light and I've done a lot of analysis on light speed. ... and x-rays, or indeed any comparison of emr transit time vs. ... My sides are hurting from laughing too much. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Your own personal black hole?
    ... than visible light and I've done a lot of analysis on light speed. ... and x-rays, or indeed any comparison of emr transit time vs. ... light rays - no?As the sun sets the x-rays are cut off before the visible, ... trailing edge be redder - you agree?HAHAHAHA! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)