Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:00:11 GMT
In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:42:40 GMT
<kohDg.81166$9d4.22892@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Two morons and an imbecile coach in one debate, none of which
have a clue. Funny to watch.
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7c00r3-7a7.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, PD
| <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on 11 Aug 2006 14:21:12 -0700
| <1155331272.682698.223580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| >
| > kenseto wrote:
| >> "shevek" <shevek4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >> news:1155327415.738254.323720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >> >
| >> > Good answer.. but perhaps the question is not specific enough.
| >> > What is one second of "real time"?
| >>
| >> The earth clock second at sea level is defined as one second of real
time
| >> (absolute time). The clock reading for this interval of real time
(absolute
| >> time) in any other frame is determined using SR/GR or IRT.
| >>
| >
| > Really? What in the name of heaven singles out a clock at Earth's sea
| > level as being the physically preferred "absolute time"??
| >
| > PD
| >
|
| Probably the fact that we live here. :-)
The Nepalese do not live at sea level.
A clock is an oscillator plus a counter. It doesn't matter where the
counter is, we can count oscillations of a pulsar at sea level and
they'll be the same count as from Mt Olympus on Mars, grinning ape coach.
And the reason TAI != GPS is ... ?
[rest snipped]
Androcles
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- References:
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: jem
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: shevek
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: kenseto
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: PD
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- Prev by Date: Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
- Next by Date: Re: Evidences for the ether
- Previous by thread: Re: Evidences for the ether
- Next by thread: Re: Evidences for the ether
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|