Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 16:42:52 GMT
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g391r3-nln.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
| <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on Sat, 12 Aug 2006 09:42:40 GMT
| <kohDg.81167$9d4.40226@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| >
| > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
| > in message news:jugDg.17433$i64.421939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > [anip]
| >
| > x' versus xi?
| > Androcles
|
| Since c = 0, most of the rest of Einstein's logic is moot. We'll just
| have to go back to caveman physics.
You have that wrong, troglodyte, c = 0/0, Einstein had no logic and neither
do you. The dynamics of a variable speed of light is far more interesting
than Einstein's fairy tales or Dork's misconceptions about the before
and after length of a "Lorentz" contracted cuckoo's egg.
Androcles.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
- Prev by Date: Re: Evidences for the ether
- Next by Date: Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
- Previous by thread: What is the formula of Nothing?
- Next by thread: Re: FAREWELL TO PHYSICS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading