Re: What is the formula of Nothing?

From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 14:06:51 GMT

"socratus" <israelsad@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1155470765.722128.254490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

For Sorcerer/ Androcles
==================
My proofe.
1.
Now it is considered that the Universe, as an absolute frame of
reference
is in a condition of T = 2,7K (rests of relic radiation of the Big
Bang ).

You can stop right there and prove this imaginary "Big Bang".
Androcles.

.

References:
- What is the formula of Nothing?
  - From: socratus
- Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  - From: kunzmilan
- Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
  - From: socratus

Prev by Date: Re: Evidences for the ether
Next by Date: Re: Hard SR questions?
Previous by thread: Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
Next by thread: Re: What is the formula of Nothing?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Time before the big bang
... Androcles wrote: ... > Nobody has yet shown any evidence of a big bang anyway. ... > the galaxies are moving away. ... > is a drop in energy. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Time.
... There was no Big Bang, there is no evidence for a Big Bang. ... Androcles. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Time.
... There was no Big Bang, there is no evidence for a Big Bang. ... Androcles. ... Socratus wrote "Big Bang", not Big Bang. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Time.
... | There was no Big Bang, there is no evidence for a Big Bang. ... | Socratus wrote "Big Bang", ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Query about simultaneous events..
... | "Androcles" wrote in message ... | Robert B. winn ...
(sci.physics.relativity)