Re: Hard SR questions?


N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) skrev:

Dear jt64:

<jt64@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1155494971.336801.33070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
(According to relativity) and Lorentz it is easy to see
when you check my figures for the actual length
contraction above. Nothing else, it is just wishful
thinking on your behalf.

Your figures are mutually inconsistent.

Care to try for second prize?

David A. Smith

I understand that the expected Hz would need to be a fraction of 1/7
when travelin in 0,99c.

Within the example 6000/7

However it will not happen because there is inconsistency between the
relativity doppler effect and the lorents transformation for some
reason the actual so there must be something wrong with the lorents
transformation.

Because without any doubt 60 frames will pass in 0.01 seconds according
to relativity because *FIRST BIT IN FRAME MUST PASS EXACTLY AFTER ONE
SECOND*<--->*LAST BIT LAST FRAME MUST PASS BEFORE SHIP* so.........
1.01-1=0.01.

There is no room for interpretation of the above. ANYONE CAN SEE IT

So if we know the factor is dilated by roughly 7 at ship. We actually
know that *FROM WITHIN THE SHIP FRAME* it is sent out 60 frames during
0,14285714285714285714285714285714.

*THIS IS NOT NEGOTIABLE OR A MATTER OF INTERPRETATION*

And if we know this we also know that in 1 second the framerate will be
60/0,14285714285714285714285714285714.

DO YOU FIND THIS HARD TO UNDERSTAND?

JT

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Letter to Dirk Van de moortel
    ... most of modern relativists consider that the twin paradox is ... It refers to the interpretation ... differential change of frames and its associated change in synchronization. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: PD does not understand SR
    ... "All inertial frames are totally equivalent ... Because your interpretation is pretty clear from what you said: ... "According to Einstein's first postulate, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)