Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: "tomgee" <tyropress@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Aug 2006 13:10:37 -0700
Ilja Schmelzer wrote:
"tomgee" <tyropress@xxxxxxxxx> schriebSuit yourself, you're the one who brought it up, remember? "To
Ilja Schmelzer wrote:meaning.
"tomgee" <tyropress@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb
Ilja Schmelzer wrote:
"tomgee" <tyropress@xxxxxxxxx> schrieb
GR lives without a notion of an "inertial frame" and is doing fine.
To search for an inertial frame you have first to define its
If you don't like mine, show us yours, then.I have already done that for you. If you disagree with it,
which apparently you do, then argue that and not that I
have yet to define it. I have said that I-frames are not
real objects, but a figment of our imaginations, so we do
not "search" for I-frames, we create them.
And this is a definition? At best, it is a phrase which
defines some of its properties.
I can live without this notion, so I don't have to define it.
search for an inertial frame you have first to define its meaning."
Right, that explains this topic's title.
As I recall, the OP referred to SR, not GR.
In a thread about the CMBR SR is not sufficient.
The CMBR is not covered by SR.
That's your opinion, but I disagree.
That is an acknowledged fact, the CMBR existsNot necessarily. AE put SR out ... He did not ...
in an expanding universe which is outside the
domain of applicability of SR.
Note that he did not say ...
AE's words are irrelevant.
No, not so. SR is based on relative motion and the
We have two theories,
SR and GR, and the expansion of the universe can
be described appropriately only in GR (or other
metric theories of gravity), but not in SR.
expansion process is based on observed relative
motion. What more do you want in order to understand
that the cbr is within the domain of applicability of SR?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- References:
- The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: mluttgens
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: cmaj10
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: tomgee
- Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- The CMBR falsifies SR
- Prev by Date: Re: O'Barr: The Absolute Reference Frame.
- Next by Date: Re: Evidences for the ether
- Previous by thread: Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- Next by thread: Re: The CMBR falsifies SR
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|