Re: Einstein, m=L(c^2), the Nobel Prize, and charges of "plagiarism"


surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

You clearly violated the purpose of that NG by your submission (at
bottom). By your own admission your submission was about a person and
his ideolgy and how he framed his theory for publication and, lastly,
on a historical perspective of the published paper, but all of that is
outside the domain of sci.physics.research, and none of that is about
the theory presented only, which is all that that NG might care to read
about (it might not even want that much as that paper is 100 years old
at this point).

Hello! Einstein ceased to be a person when he died. You are talking
as if he is still alive. You are talkinig as if he lives within you.

Einstein's 1905 paper has been regarded as the bible. Without
carefully going through the math, you assume that paper is still the
bible, and this is not what science is about. You challenged me
earlier to find holes in Einstein's argument regarding (E = m c^2), and
I did. I pointed out Einstein's first mistake. There are more. It is
time to let the world know about this.

sci.physics.research appears to want submissions only about current
physical research that is testable, not historical "research" and not
polemical writings.

Again, this is BS. Did you even look at the title of this post? How
were the previous posts not censored? That is hypocritical.

Furthermore, you claimed:
1) Principle of Relativity started with Galileo.
2) Constancy of the speed of light was first proposed by Voigt.
3) Lorentz Transform was first written down by Larmor.

Yes, these are all historical facts.

You claimed that Einstein was unscholarly, yet you refused to give any
scholarly support to back up these claims you made. Your failure to do
so, besides being hypocritical, is bad enough for
sci.physics.relativity and twice as bad for sci.physics.research,
demonstrating that you have no concept of what that NG is designed for.

I expect the flamers to come after me with challenges within the
confine of mathematics and logic. I expect that newsgroup to censor
all the body parts thrown at me.

sci.physics.research is merely a group similar to a political rally
where one speaker says something and all others applaud to no end.
Yes, I am greatly disappointed.

.