Re: TIME DILATION


"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:s4vfr3-esj.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
| <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:01:55 GMT
| <nH5Fg.4632$fV1.3827@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| >
| > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
| > in message news:oP4Fg.27115$Hn3.459807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | "Stamenin" <tasko.s@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1155690017.627763.167180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | [snip]
| > |
| >
| > Ok, snip .. I thought it was [anip].
| >
| > x', xi?
| >
| > Androcles
| >
|
| This is all mathematical crap anyway. You want *physical* proof.

I already have all the physical proof I need.
Sagnac and V 1493 Aql will do very nicely.

If a $7 greenback were a blankback, it woud be an invalid banknote
that any American would recognise even without President Einstein's
portrait on the front.

Half the analysis of
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Rocket/eq22.A.GIF
is missing, so as you say, mathematical crap.
If these so-called physicists are so darned clever, how come they
are blind?


|
| The best I can do is an experimental cite such as:
|
| * Herbert E. Ives and G.R. Stilwell, "An experimental study of
| the rate of a moving clock"
|
| J. Opt. Soc. Am 28 215-226 (1938) and part II. J. Opt.
| Soc. Am. 31, 369-374 (1941)
|
| Unfortunately, throwing this at Google just returned me back to
|
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transverse_Doppler_effect
|
| (where I got this from), which isn't all that good an explanation IMO.
|
| (I'm not sure how to better it without throwing in a lot of what might
| be considered irrelevant calculations, though, leading to the other
| formula sqrt(1+v/c)/sqrt(1-v/c) or its reciprocal.)

You should look at the transverse mass effect.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img155.gif
All this crap should tell a sane man something is seriously wrong with
Einstein's math. Any normal mathematical investigator (not a genius)
should be able to trace it.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/DominoEffect.GIF
Make one error, it propagates. Einstein made many. There can be
no relationship between reality and the ravings of a lunatic.

Androcles.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: TIME DILATION
    ... In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer ... is missing, so as you say, mathematical crap. ... If these so-called physicists are so darned clever, ... Einstein made the fundamental mistake that lightspeed is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: I am Trying To Learn Relativity
    ... Androcles wrote: ... There is no proof that light moves diagonally in the moving frame ... preferably from actual physicists. ... asylum. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: I am Trying To Learn Relativity
    ... Androcles wrote: ... preferably from actual physicists. ... asylum. ... Idiot! ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: I am Trying To Learn Relativity
    ... Androcles wrote: ... There is no proof that light moves diagonally in the moving frame at ... preferably from actual physicists. ... asylum. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: I am Trying To Learn Relativity
    ... Androcles wrote: ... There is no proof that light moves diagonally in the moving frame at ... preferably from actual physicists. ... asylum. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading