Re: TIME DILATION


Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"Peter Christensen" <PeCh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1156326188.317346.166440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
<vertvergon@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1155323883.066336.132830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

TIME DILATION

See also
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Myopea.html

None of your two postulates says anything about the speed of light. Do
you agree with Einsteins speed-of-light postulate or not?

Those are VERGON's (VERT's) postulates, not mine.
Bold text is written by the fumbler.
You'll have to talk directly to the crackpot. Good luck.

Dirk Vdm

OK, I see. I thought, that it was yours, because the link is under
'vdmoortel'.


On time dilation derived from Einsteins speed-of-light postulate:
news:1155651858.612826.30200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

PC


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: scientists take simultaneous leave of their senses!!!
    ... "Dirk Van de moortel" wrote ... The speed of light in the two frames is not crucial at all (other than it being one of the two postulates of SR) .. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: TIME DILATION
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... TIME DILATION ... None of your two postulates says anything about the speed of light. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: TIME DILATION
    ... |>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... |>> None of your two postulates says anything about the speed of light. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: TIME DILATION
    ... Sorcerer wrote: ... |>> Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... |>> None of your two postulates says anything about the speed of light. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: TIME DILATION
    ... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: ... None of your two postulates says anything about the speed of light. ... On time dilation derived from Einsteins speed-of-light postulate: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast