Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:23:47 -0700
"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts137@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:q2FHg.11377$1f6.230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have replaced the version on arXiv.org, but it probably won't be
available until 10pm EDT.
Tom Roberts
Got the one via email. Thanks. Much easier to print out and read now.
Looks like a good piece of work after reading it quickly.
It just totally amazes me that some people still can't accept that SR is
correct in its domain after mountains of evidence. However, this (no
motion relative to an ether) does not exclude a relativistic medium of a
"non-material" nature. By "material" I mean Standard Model particles.
The recent "dark matter" evidence shows that there is more to nature
than we currently know about (actually detecting an elementary "dark
matter" particle).
FrediFizzx
Quantum Vacuum Charge papers;
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601110
http://www.vacuum-physics.com
.
- References:
- An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: Tom Roberts
- An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- Prev by Date: Re: Eternal Universe?
- Next by Date: Re: Poincare conjecture
- Previous by thread: Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- Next by thread: Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
