Re: What is time?

In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:03:36 GMT
<Y7lIg.179979$F8.124712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

"Barry" <sasalobo@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VekIg.12053$EF2.9523@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
|
| > One could easily say: "Time is what we read on a clock,
| > and if that does not satisfy you, stay away from science".
|
| That's kind of related to what Einstein said.
|
| Since Minkowski we have no space or time, only spacetime. Or so it has
| been said.
|
| So "proper time" is what we read on a clock. It's a parameter in
spacetime.
|
| Relativity has done away with "time".
|
| Barry

That shithead Dork thinks:
"we establish by definition that the "time" required by light to travel from
A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A." is "science".

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Rocket/Rocket.htm
Androcles


And your definition of science is what, precisely?

--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
.

Quantcast