Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
- From: rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Aug 2006 08:37:23 -0700
Tom Roberts wrote:
This claim should nail it, it is clearly incorrect. The signal varies
If so, he completely ignores the enormous systematic drift, and makes
several incorrect statements about variation over time of the signal
(including the claim it varies during a single turn).
only over very long period of times due to the variation of v_Earth.
These guys got it right:
http://qom.physik.hu-berlin.de/research_kt.htm
.
- References:
- An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: Sergey Karavashkin
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
- From: Harry
- Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
- From: Tom Roberts
- An Explanation of Dayton Miller’s Anomalous “Ether Drift” Result
- Prev by Date: Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
- Next by Date: Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- Previous by thread: Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
- Next by thread: Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
- Index(es):
Loading