Re: About time
- From: BernardZ <bernardZ@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:35:55 +1000
In article <bc5Jg.20067$rP1.13786@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
rubbish@xxxxxxxx says...
I may be a total rookie to physics but on a former question
here: 'What is Time' no one has an answer (and should not).
I beg to differ. I think you were given the correct answer - what a clock
reads. Beyond that your really into philosophy.
Is that a reflection on our ignorance eg genetics was once a subject of
philosophy before it became a science in modern times?
--
The people that believe that the world is flat are proof that heaps of
time, huge amounts of scientific evidence, plenty of eyewitness
accounts, numerous experts opinion and mountains of photographs are not
enough to convince some people! What is particularly frustrating is
that there are many such people on the Usenet.
Observations of Bernard - No 104
.
- References:
- About time
- From: Gert Baars
- Re: About time
- From: Bill Hobba
- About time
- Prev by Date: Eisntein's Unified field theory using Newton Mechanics
- Next by Date: Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
- Previous by thread: Re: About time
- Next by thread: Re: About time
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|