Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
- From: "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 06:05:11 -0700
Dear e_erpelding:
<e_erpelding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156911438.267995.186940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
....
The point of this posting is merely to point out that
the idea of the TARDIS being larger inside than
outside was quite clever and wasn't far fetched at
all.
The "bottomless bag" is a pretty old concept. Wizards,
sorcerers, and magicians (the more powerful ones) were supposed
to have them. Mary Poppins showed one off in the movie of the
same name.
A few years ago, there was some discussion here of warp bubbles,
allowing one to travel FTL. I don't believe the external volume
assigned to the bubble would be necessarily equal to the internal
volume assigned...
David A. Smith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
- From: e_erpelding
- Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
- References:
- The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
- From: e_erpelding@xxxxxxxxx
- The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
- Prev by Date: Re: Moving Dimension Theory...:)
- Next by Date: Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D)
- Previous by thread: Re: The Rotating Disk
- Next by thread: Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
- Index(es):