Re: About time
- From: "GSS" <gurcharn_sandhu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 05:38:46 -0700
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect wrote:
First of all, you should be more specific with yourself, for instance, the
time the way it is counted as to profit to whom or a systematically, the
existence and the meaning of the time, whether, the one would not be without
the other.
Therefore, the time, it does still a being a fastidious translation along
the cycles of the nature, which it can make them to apprach a simple way and
a manners to control the events and the behaviours of the living spicies on
the shell of the earth.
Time is a measure of change.
When we refere to time, we generally mean the *Measure of Time*.
http://www.geocities.com/gurcharn_sandhu/htm_art/time_measure.htm
GSS
.
- References:
- About time
- From: Gert Baars
- Re: About time
- From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- About time
- Prev by Date: Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
- Next by Date: Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
- Previous by thread: Re: About time
- Next by thread: Re: About time
- Index(es):