Re: Even cranks get published


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message news:F%mJg.50151$K04.820274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| <rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156959322.897073.15570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > Sorcerer wrote:
| >> <rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| >> news:1156952763.771923.287980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >> | Look what the cat dragged in from Apeiron (an antirelativistic
| >> | journal):
| >> |
| >> | http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO1PDF/V05n1lut.pdf
| >>
| >> Yes...
| >> Look what the cat dragged in from Annalen der Physik, a crackpot
journal.
| >>
| >> http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
| >>
| >> Even cranks get published.
| >>
| >> Androcles
| >
| > How come you don't get published?
|
| He lies a lot:
|
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/59c1abddc5da4532
| Androcles (aka John Parker):
| | "One of the advantages of a pseudonym on Usenet is nobody knows who
you
| | really are, and I can be controversial and test the response before
| | publishing in a journal under my own name, having a fairly good idea
of how
| | it will be received. This has caused me to modify my paper in a slight
way,
| | and avoided a possible rejection. While that doesn't guarantee
acceptance,
| | it certainly circumvents objections that should be caught but
overlooked. I
| | do not recommend disclosing full details to anyone of your degrees or
| | previous publications on Usenet. It loses an obvious advantage."
|
|
| Dirk Vdm
Oh, such sound advice... He must have been a clever chap.

So Dork, how come you don't get published?
Androcles





.