Re: Even cranks get published
- From: "Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 17:38:06 -0700
Sorcerer wrote:
<rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156952763.771923.287980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Look what the cat dragged in from Apeiron (an antirelativistic
| journal):
|
| http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO1PDF/V05n1lut.pdf
Yes...
Look what the cat dragged in from Annalen der Physik, a crackpot journal.
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Even cranks get published.
In that 1905 paper, I am discovering worng mathematics everyday. Why
is it that no one else has noticed? For example, in section 3,
Einstein's derivation of Lorentz Transform is utterly nonsense and full
of errors. Does anyone want to discuss this particular issue?Moving
forward with his erros, he concluded with Lorentz Transform. Without
referencing to other's prior works on Lorentz Transform, that would
certainly make Einstein a plagiarist.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Even cranks get published
- From: JanPB
- Re: Even cranks get published
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: Even cranks get published
- References:
- Even cranks get published
- From: rambus2005
- Re: Even cranks get published
- From: Sorcerer
- Even cranks get published
- Prev by Date: Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- Next by Date: Re: About time
- Previous by thread: Re: Even cranks get published
- Next by thread: Re: Even cranks get published
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
