Re: Even cranks get published


"Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156984686.832686.42750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Sorcerer wrote:
| > <rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1156952763.771923.287980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | Look what the cat dragged in from Apeiron (an antirelativistic
| > | journal):
| > |
| > | http://redshift.vif.com/JournalFiles/Pre2001/V05NO1PDF/V05n1lut.pdf
| >
| > Yes...
| > Look what the cat dragged in from Annalen der Physik, a crackpot
journal.
| >
| > http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
| >
| > Even cranks get published.
|
| In that 1905 paper, I am discovering worng mathematics everyday. Why
| is it that no one else has noticed? For example, in section 3,
| Einstein's derivation of Lorentz Transform is utterly nonsense and full
| of errors. Does anyone want to discuss this particular issue?Moving
| forward with his erros, he concluded with Lorentz Transform. Without
| referencing to other's prior works on Lorentz Transform, that would
| certainly make Einstein a plagiarist.


Sure, I'll discuss it:
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Rocket/Rocket.htm

However, there is no point crying over spilt milk.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Sagnac/Sagnac.htm

Androcles


.

Relevant Pages