Re: About time
- From: "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2006 08:11:51 -0700
Gert Baars wrote:
I may be a total rookie to physics but on a former question
here: 'What is Time' no one has an answer (and should not).
In replies to your former post, time was related to you in
terms of accelerating a mass. (Just as Newton did )
If time can not be understood then how can anything related
to time (like the whole lot) be 'understood' or discussed.
Unless you are a pedestrian or an oil shiek, then you understand
the reality of time whenever you pay for motor fuel.
<< invariance with respect to time translation gives the
well known law of conservation of energy >>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem
Sue...
.
- References:
- About time
- From: Gert Baars
- About time
- Prev by Date: Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
- Next by Date: Re: Evidences for the ether
- Previous by thread: Re: About time
- Next by thread: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
- Index(es):