sci.physics.relativity
- Solution to the Action at Distance Paradox,
ny2292000
- Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc,
rambus2005
- ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS,
vergon
- A very persistent moronic spammer - Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- "The Einstein Hoax",
LLiw
- Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR,
count zero
- NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
Ajay Sharma
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction,
actionintegral
- Interesting idea,
actionintegral
- Re: Interesting idea,
Dirk Van de moortel
Mass and Potential Energy,
actionintegral
On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2,
AJAY SHARMA
"Is There a Force of Gravity?",
LLiw
Re: I read Hammond's posts!,
RMDumse
Re: I read Hammond's posts!,
Winnaker Doodle
100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
ajay2244
Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
Pete
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
physicsajay
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
rambus2005
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
AJAY SHARMA
- Anyone who knows physics can tell the error in your "papers".,
rambus2005
- NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
AJAY SHARMA
- NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
AJAY SHARMA
- Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
AJAY SHARMA
- Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
Ajay Sharma
- Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
Ajay Sharma
Aren't they downside up?,
Barry
"The Error in Relativistic Physics",
LLiw
Re: Physicists seek to put one thing in two places,
Sorcerer
Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate,
Mike Fontenot
"money honestly",
bramar
is it possible? (speed of light),
nobody1357
A CHALLENGE,
vergon
Excercise the Third,
Barry
Exercise the Second,
Barry
Exercise the First,
Barry
kill files working beautifully,
Phil
Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
devianju
Re: Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
rambus2005
- nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
devianju
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
rambus2005
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
devianju
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
Ajay Sharma
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
rick++
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
Ajay Sharma
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
rambus2005
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
Ajay Sharma
"Is String Theory Justified?",
Kow
Geometerizing GP-B data ?,
Sue...
rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
Phil
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rambus2005
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
physicsajay
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rstokis
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
physicsajay
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
physicsajay
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rambus2005
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
physicsajay
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
AJAY SHARMA
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rusty
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rambus2005
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
AJAY SHARMA
Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric,
Edward Green
Coordinates and variables,
xray4abc
To WACHO , Rambus2005@yahoo.com,
physicsajay
To moron Ajay Sharma aka : physicsajay,einnew,devianju, etc, etc,
rambus2005
Ajay Sharma-go spam elswhere,
rambus2005
Ekpyrotic theory,
Jim O'Reilly
Rambus2005@yahoo.com give put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation ,,
physicsajay
Rambus2005@yahoo.com take responsibility of irresponsible ABUSING peer reviewed and published work (in international journals and conferences),
tomson786
Actio at Distance, Quantum Encryption and Corollaries,
ny2292000
Re: PROOF that modern art explains relativity hoax,
rambus2005
Alpha Arae is spinning,
Sue...
Multiple (physical) Dimensions for dummies (by Ken Udut- simplify3@aol.com),
simplify3
About Lagrange in GR II,
Ken S. Tucker
Lagrange in GR ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
carlip-nospam
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
shevek
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Russell
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
carlip-nospam
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Igor
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE,
vergon
Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL,
Phil
Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?,
Mike
New Look on Relativity,
spaceflow
The restrictions of human perception,
Gert Baars
universal constant,
Macaca
How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Phil
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How GPS works,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How GPS works,
Phil
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Phil
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How GPS works,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Phil
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
"The Arrow of Time",
Kow
The article refers to the relativity.,
Stamenin
Donkey, Rambus2005@yahoo.com showed folly in Ajay Sharma’s paper extending Einstein’s E=mc2;,
physicsajay
Donkey, Rambus@yahoo.com showed folly in Ajay Sharma’s paper extending Einstein’s E=mc2;,
physicsajay
Birth Day of Einstein’s E=mc2 is approaching.,
ajay2244
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism",
Kow
Rebuttal to Ajay Sharma's nonsensical E=Amc^2,
rambus2005
Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Golden Boar
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Golden Boar
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Randy Poe
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Randy Poe
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Randy Poe
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Golden Boar
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
PD
Ajay Sharma - professional spammer,
rambus2005
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations",
Negab
Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian,
Mike
Einstein and Hilbert: Dark matter,
valerio2
SR false?,
Rudolf Drabek
- Re: SR false?,
Sue...
- Re: SR false?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Rudolf Drabek
- Re: SR false?,
shuba
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: SR false?,
Rudolf Drabek
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
vergon
- Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
rambus2005
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
rambus2005
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
Sorcerer
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
dlzc
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
Sorcerer
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
dlzc
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
Sorcerer
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
rambus2005
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
harry
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: SR false?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sue...
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Sue...
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Message not available
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
Message not available
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2",
Negab
effet allais et pioneer,
joseph
Re: Paper: Tests of General Fuckwittery from Observing the Double Straw,
Sorcerer
Re: Paper: Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar,
Sue...
Einstein and Poincare book,
valeri
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
rambus2005
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
valeri
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
rambus2005
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
valeri
- Contemporary Fundamental Physics Series (new books),
valeri
- Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website,
rambus2005
- Re: Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website,
valeri
- Re: Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website,
valerio2
- Contemporary Fundamental Physics,
valerio2
- Valeri Dvoeglazov gets desperate for attention,
rambus2005
- Contemporary Fundamental Physics (new books),
valerio2
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
Dirk Van de moortel
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1",
Negab
Relating the reality of a quantized time to GR.,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: You guys think you're kooks? HAA!,
jamesahart79
Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma,
physicsajay
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Negab
The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sue...
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
harry
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sue...
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sue...
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sue...
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity.,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
wugi
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
alanmc95210
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
yinbing-zhou
Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
LEJ Brouwer
Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
Dirk Van de moortel
Message not availableRe: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
Bill Hobba
Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
Sorcerer
Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?,
gnygaard
The standards,
Gert Baars
Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
PD
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Mike
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Mike
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Mike
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Mike
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Bill Hobba
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Eric Gisse
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Eric Gisse
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
harry
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
harry
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
RP
Fractal formula for alpha and evolution of e,pi, omega, h, G, N avogadro,
ivars . fabriciuss
HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
harry
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
harry
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sue...
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sue...
THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Bill Hobba
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
devianju
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
devianju
- Fresh self-advertisment from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma,
devianju
- THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Fresh BS from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
devianju
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
PD
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
PD
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
devianju
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
PD
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Randy Poe
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
PD
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
PD
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
- Fresh BS from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Donkey Rambus on move,
devianju
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
vps137
- Re: Lorentz factor in GR?,
Sue...
Re: the black fishing hole,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
dark matter and 'theory of everything',
robert
At Very High Rotation Speed,
franckspike
8 Years Ago,
Barry
Re: Mass increases, when light energy is emitted- a new cretinism from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
"Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations",
Negab
Pound-Rebka experiment in Model Mechanics,
PD
From here to Aeternity...,
Edward Green
What on Earth is this?,
Sorcerer
Entropy,
Barry
- Re: Entropy,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Entropy,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Entropy,
Barry
- Re: Entropy,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Entropy,
Barry
- Re: Entropy,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Entropy,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Entropy,
Barry
- Re: Entropy,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Entropy,
Barry
- Re: Entropy,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Entropy,
Barry
- Re: Entropy,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Entropy,
Sorcerer
- Re: Entropy,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Entropy,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Entropy,
Barry
- Re: Entropy,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Gravity solved with the quadratic equation,
CoreyWhite
singulerity,
frodo
"Corrections to Special Relativity",
Ym
The speed of a photon in a gravitational field,
Phil Gardner
From OPRAH and WALL STREET JOURNAL !,
suzan . shepherd
Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox,
Barry
Peristalsis,
Sorcerer
"Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?",
Ym
Sorcerer alias Tom Roberts,
Henry Haapalainen
"Are Unified Field Theories Justified?",
Ym
Gravity is a chain reaction within an equilibrium of chaos and entropy... The repost!,
CoreyWhite
converting vectors,
payam
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Phil
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Phil
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Phil
- Message not available
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Phil
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
shuba
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Phil
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
shuba
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Phil
- Message not available
- Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
PD
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
PD
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Message not available
Message not available
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.,
Sorcerer
RELATIVISTIC MASS,
vergon
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
Bill Hobba
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
Eric Gisse
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
Igor
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
Sue...
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
Tom Roberts
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
tomgee
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
Y.Porat
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS,
xray4abc
Rotating Pulsars and active galaxy black hole rotation,
marsfossils
spinning laser experiment,
Tom
What makes something compeling?,
ajiko
"The Matter of "Dark Matter",
Ym
Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
AllYou!
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Igor
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
thoovler
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Golden Boar
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
tomgee
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
PD
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
vergon
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Y.Porat
- Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?,
Y.Porat
Ajay Sharma - immortal fumbles,
rambus2005
"Gravity",
Ym
DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
YBM
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
YBM
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Eric Gisse
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
YBM
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Sue...
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Mike
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Mike
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Mike
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
Mike
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
xray4abc
IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?,
Stamenin
Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift,
John C . Polasek
Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?,
Henry Haapalainen
Poincare Group Not Complete Yet, Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz/4+1 Spacetime,
qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
A Symmetry between Space and Time,
Barry
"Relativity and Reasonableness Tests",
Ym
Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law,
Eric Gisse
!!!!!!!???????!!!!!!!!,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
"Examining Mathematical Approaches",
Ym
Superluminal communication does not result in the causal loop,
gashan1971
Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT,
fpri
- Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT,
rambus2005
- Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT,
Sorcerer
- Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT,
fpri
- Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT,
Sorcerer
- Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT,
physics . einstein
- Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT,
physics . einstein
- More stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: More stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
physics . einstein
- More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
physics . einstein
- More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
physics . einstein
- Re: More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
physics . einstein
- More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Universal Donkey RAMBUS2005@yahoo.com,
physics . einstein
- Universal Donkey RAMBUS2005@yahoo.com,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma keeps pushing his idiocies refuting himself,
rambus2005
- Donkey RAMBUS changes his stand.,
physics . einstein
- Cretin Ajay Sharma kees going,
rambus2005
- Donkeys sees SUN AT NIGHT,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma helps debunk his own shit,
rambus2005
- Donkey RAMBUS show some sense,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma progresses from writing idiocies to outright lying,
rambus2005
- 100 Years of E=mc2,
physics . einstein
THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Bill Hobba
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
tomgee
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
tomgee
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Barry
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Barry
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
tomgee
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Eric Gisse
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
AllYou!
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
tomgee
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
tomgee
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Sorcerer
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
shevek
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Golden Boar
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
shevek
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
vergon
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
tomgee
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
PD
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Randy Poe
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
shevek
- Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON,
Igor
A nice joke for a change,
Mike
A metric gravity without curved space,
ajiko
Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Sorcerer
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Newton's Universe,
jem
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Newton's Universe,
oriel36
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Sorcerer
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Sorcerer
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Sorcerer
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
jem
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
jem
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
jem
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
snapdragon31
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Newton's Universe,
Barry
- Re: Newton's Universe,
snapdragon31
- Re: Newton's Universe,
jem
- Re: Newton's Universe,
surrealistic-dream
Why doesn't everything happen all at once?,
Barry
"The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light",
Toob
Light Beam and Time Stream,
G. L. Bradford
The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
JanPB
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
carlip-nospam
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
Tom Roberts
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
Eric Gisse
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
JanPB
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
JanPB
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
Tom Roberts
- What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?,
JanPB
- Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?,
carlip-nospam
- Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
LEJ Brouwer
- Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong,
LEJ Brouwer
relativity of time,
paco1955
<Possible follow-ups>
re: relativity of time,
paco1955
Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Adrocles shows he does not know what distance is.,
Golden Boar
- Re: Adrocles shows he does not know what distance is.,
Eric Gisse
- Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Barry
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
PD
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Sorcerer
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
PD
- Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.,
Sorcerer
Unification?,
Gert Baars
Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
JanPB
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
JanPB
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
Sorcerer
- Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum,
JanPB
Re: time detector,
Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
Sorcerer
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
Sorcerer
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
Sorcerer
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
Sorcerer
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
Mike
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
Sorcerer
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
fpri
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
fpri
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
fpri
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- More idiocies from Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: More idiocies from Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- More cretinisms from Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Special Donkey RAMBUS,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma, moron,
rambus2005
- Universal Donkey RAMBUS,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma does a superb job refuting his "paper",
rambus2005
- Donkey RAMBUS cahnges stand.,
physics . einstein
- Cretin Ajay Sharma persists in his scam,
rambus2005
- Foremost imbecile, Ajay Sharma persists in his lying,
rambus2005
- Foolish donkey posing intelligent,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma debunked,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma debunked,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma debunked,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma debunks himself,
rambus2005
- FOOLSIH DONKEY sits in public after being beaten,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma debunks his own cretinisms-immortal fumbles for DvM list,
rambus2005
- Donkey RAMBUS show some sense,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma - from idiocies to outright lying,
rambus2005
- 100 Years of E=mc2,
physics . einstein
The stupidity of Androcles,
Golden Boar
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
JanPB
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
Golden Boar
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
Golden Boar
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
JanPB
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor,
JanPB
- The stupidity of Bilewacky,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky,
JanPB
- Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky,
JanPB
- Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky,
JanPB
- Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Androcles,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Mike
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Mike
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Mike
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The stupidity of Ghost,
Sorcerer
- Re: The stupidity of Androcles,
Denis . Sjostrom
100 Years of E=mc2,
physics . einstein
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2,
Sorcerer
- 100 Years of E=mc2 by the well-known moron, Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
rambus2005
- Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma, helps debunking his own idiocies,
rambus2005
- Foolish donkey RAMBUS posing intelligent,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma's llatest idiocy : "mass depends upon angle",
rambus2005
- Foolish donkey RAMBUS posing intelligent,
physics . einstein
- Foolish donkey RAMBUS posing intelligent,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma continues to debunk his own idiocies.,
rambus2005
- Donkey RAMBUS show some sense,
physics . einstein
- Ajay Sharma progresses from writing idiocies to outright lying,
rambus2005
- 100 Years of E=mc2,
physics . einstein
breaking news from CERN ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Tom S.
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sue...
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
YBM
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Igor
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
mluttgens
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Tom S.
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Tom S.
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sue...
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sue...
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?,
Sorcerer
SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability,
Mike
Re: Gravity is a chain reaction within an equilibrium of entropy & chaos.,
guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
Our Heavenly Father on 12-29-04,
cattheon
Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE,
ZenIsWhen
Re: The Rotating Disk,
Tom Roberts
Re: What is time?,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: On the prior Definition of the Meter and the Inaccuracies therein,
The Ghost In The Machine
Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
dlzc
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Randy Poe
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sorcerer
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
dlzc
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sorcerer
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
dlzc
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sorcerer
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
dlzc
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sorcerer
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
jcon
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL,
b92057
Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv,
Jay R. Yablon
Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result,
oriel36
I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Sorcerer
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Sorcerer
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Sorcerer
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Sorcerer
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Sorcerer
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Denis . Sjostrom
Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
FrediFizzx
Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Jeff
Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
xxein
Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
stefanbanev
Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...,
Bill Hobba
Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
xxein
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
Sue...
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
xxein
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions,
Denis . Sjostrom
Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS,
Edward Green
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Sorcerer
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Sorcerer
Re: Photon bend another photon,
Randy M. Dumse
Re: String Theory Humor & The Triumph of Moving Dimensions Theory: arxiv.org--HA HA AHAH HAHAHAHAHAH HA HA AHAH!!!,
Jeff
Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum,
Mike Fontenot
Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Sorcerer
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization,
TymBuk2
Re: Evidences for the ether,
Henry Haapalainen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Sorcerer
- Re: Evidences for the ether,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
e_erpelding
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Sorcerer
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Igor
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Sorcerer
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Sorcerer
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Sorcerer
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Igor
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Igor
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Sorcerer
- Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?,
Eric Gisse
Re: About time,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: Comments on my FAQ page (was: What become...),
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Daryl McCullough
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Sorcerer
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Sorcerer
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Barry
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Barry
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Barry
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Barry
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Barry
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Barry
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Comments on my FAQ page,
Eric Gisse
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Comments on my FAQ page (was: What become...),
Sue...
Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?,
mluttgens
Re: What is the first law of Universe ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Even cranks get published,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?,
Barry
