sci.physics.relativity
- Solution to the Action at Distance Paradox,
ny2292000
- Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc,
rambus2005
- ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS,
vergon
- A very persistent moronic spammer - Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- "The Einstein Hoax",
LLiw
- Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR,
count zero
- NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
Ajay Sharma
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction,
actionintegral
- Interesting idea,
actionintegral
- Re: Interesting idea,
Dirk Van de moortel
Mass and Potential Energy,
actionintegral
On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2,
AJAY SHARMA
"Is There a Force of Gravity?",
LLiw
Re: I read Hammond's posts!,
RMDumse
Re: I read Hammond's posts!,
Winnaker Doodle
100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
ajay2244
Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
Pete
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
physicsajay
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
rambus2005
- Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?,
AJAY SHARMA
- Anyone who knows physics can tell the error in your "papers".,
rambus2005
- NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
AJAY SHARMA
- NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
AJAY SHARMA
- Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
AJAY SHARMA
- Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
Ajay Sharma
- Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).,
Ajay Sharma
Aren't they downside up?,
Barry
"The Error in Relativistic Physics",
LLiw
Re: Physicists seek to put one thing in two places,
Sorcerer
Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate,
Mike Fontenot
"money honestly",
bramar
is it possible? (speed of light),
nobody1357
A CHALLENGE,
vergon
Excercise the Third,
Barry
Exercise the Second,
Barry
Exercise the First,
Barry
kill files working beautifully,
Phil
Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
devianju
Re: Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
rambus2005
- nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
devianju
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
rambus2005
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
devianju
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
Ajay Sharma
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
rick++
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
Ajay Sharma
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
rambus2005
- Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.,
Ajay Sharma
"Is String Theory Justified?",
Kow
Geometerizing GP-B data ?,
Sue...
rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
Phil
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rambus2005
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
physicsajay
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rstokis
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
physicsajay
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
physicsajay
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rambus2005
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
physicsajay
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
AJAY SHARMA
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rusty
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
rambus2005
- Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?,
AJAY SHARMA
Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric,
Edward Green
Coordinates and variables,
xray4abc
To WACHO , Rambus2005@yahoo.com,
physicsajay
To moron Ajay Sharma aka : physicsajay,einnew,devianju, etc, etc,
rambus2005
Ajay Sharma-go spam elswhere,
rambus2005
Ekpyrotic theory,
Jim O'Reilly
Rambus2005@yahoo.com give put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation ,,
physicsajay
Rambus2005@yahoo.com take responsibility of irresponsible ABUSING peer reviewed and published work (in international journals and conferences),
tomson786
Actio at Distance, Quantum Encryption and Corollaries,
ny2292000
Re: PROOF that modern art explains relativity hoax,
rambus2005
Alpha Arae is spinning,
Sue...
Multiple (physical) Dimensions for dummies (by Ken Udut- simplify3@aol.com),
simplify3
About Lagrange in GR II,
Ken S. Tucker
Lagrange in GR ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
carlip-nospam
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
shevek
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Russell
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
carlip-nospam
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Pete
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Igor
Re: Lagrange in GR ?,
Tom Roberts
THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE,
vergon
Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL,
Phil
Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?,
Mike
New Look on Relativity,
spaceflow
The restrictions of human perception,
Gert Baars
universal constant,
Macaca
How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
harry
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Phil
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How GPS works,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How GPS works,
Phil
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Phil
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: How GPS works,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Sorcerer
- Re: How GPS works,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: How GPS works,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
- Re: How GPS works,
Phil
- Re: How GPS works,
Tom Roberts
"The Arrow of Time",
Kow
The article refers to the relativity.,
Stamenin
Donkey, Rambus2005@yahoo.com showed folly in Ajay Sharma’s paper extending Einstein’s E=mc2;,
physicsajay
Donkey, Rambus@yahoo.com showed folly in Ajay Sharma’s paper extending Einstein’s E=mc2;,
physicsajay
Birth Day of Einstein’s E=mc2 is approaching.,
ajay2244
"The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism",
Kow
Rebuttal to Ajay Sharma's nonsensical E=Amc^2,
rambus2005
Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Golden Boar
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Golden Boar
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Randy Poe
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Randy Poe
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Randy Poe
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Sorcerer
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Golden Boar
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).,
PD
Ajay Sharma - professional spammer,
rambus2005
"Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations",
Negab
Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian,
Mike
Einstein and Hilbert: Dark matter,
valerio2
SR false?,
Rudolf Drabek
- Re: SR false?,
Sue...
- Re: SR false?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Rudolf Drabek
- Re: SR false?,
shuba
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: SR false?,
Rudolf Drabek
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
vergon
- Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
rambus2005
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
rambus2005
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
Sorcerer
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
dlzc
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
Sorcerer
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
dlzc
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
Sorcerer
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
rambus2005
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
harry
- Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: SR false?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sue...
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Sue...
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: SR false?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Message not available
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: SR false?,
Sorcerer
Message not available
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2",
Negab
effet allais et pioneer,
joseph
Re: Paper: Tests of General Fuckwittery from Observing the Double Straw,
Sorcerer
Re: Paper: Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar,
Sue...
Einstein and Poincare book,
valeri
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
rambus2005
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
valeri
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
rambus2005
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
valeri
- Contemporary Fundamental Physics Series (new books),
valeri
- Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website,
rambus2005
- Re: Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website,
valeri
- Re: Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website,
valerio2
- Contemporary Fundamental Physics,
valerio2
- Valeri Dvoeglazov gets desperate for attention,
rambus2005
- Contemporary Fundamental Physics (new books),
valerio2
- Re: Einstein and Poincare book,
Dirk Van de moortel
"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1",
Negab
Relating the reality of a quantized time to GR.,
Ken S. Tucker
Re: You guys think you're kooks? HAA!,
jamesahart79
Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma,
physicsajay
"Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website",
Negab
The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sue...
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
harry
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sue...
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul Cardinale
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sue...
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sue...
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
G. L. Bradford
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
The Ghost In The Machine
- The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity.,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
wugi
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Mike Fontenot
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?,
alanmc95210
On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces,
yinbing-zhou
Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
LEJ Brouwer
Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
Dirk Van de moortel
Message not availableRe: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
Bill Hobba
Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
Sorcerer
Message not availableRe: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?,
Sorcerer
Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?,
gnygaard
The standards,
Gert Baars
Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
PD
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
vps137
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Mike
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Mike
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Mike
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Mike
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Classical and modern physics,
Sorcerer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Classical and modern physics,
Henry Haapalainen
superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Bill Hobba
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
PD
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Eric Gisse
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Eric Gisse
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
harry
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
harry
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
Sorcerer
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
vergon
- Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass,
RP
Fractal formula for alpha and evolution of e,pi, omega, h, G, N avogadro,
ivars . fabriciuss
HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
harry
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
harry
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Message not available
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sue...
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Mike
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sorcerer
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
mluttgens
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
PD
- Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
kenseto
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Randy Poe
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: HOCUS POCUS,
Sue...
THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
vergon
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Bill Hobba
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Y.Porat
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
devianju
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
Igor
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
devianju
- Fresh self-advertisment from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma,
devianju
- THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Fresh BS from Ajay Sharma,
rambus2005
- Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2,
devianju