sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Pete
• Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Sue...
• Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Solution to the Action at Distance Paradox
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Russell
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: PD
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Need help with this paper, a question for mainstream people: Tom,Eric,Bill, etc
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Sorcerer
• ON THE CO-DEPENDENCE OF TIME DILATION, SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES, AND RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• A very persistent moronic spammer - Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Aren't they downside up?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: LLiw
• Re: Aren't they downside up?
  • From: harry
• Re: Aren't they downside up?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: Aren't they downside up?
  • From: harry
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: harry
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: Phil
• Re: Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Question regarding the relationship between GR and SR
  • From: count zero
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Ajay Sharma
• NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: Ajay Sharma
• Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: Ajay Sharma
• Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: Ajay Sharma
• NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: RP
• An extremely persistent cretin : Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Phil
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: SR fundamental contradiction
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: PD
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Pete
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Pete
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Pete
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Pete
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: RP
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: Interesting idea
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: shevek
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: RP
• Interesting idea
  • From: actionintegral
• Mass and Potential Energy
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Coordinates and variables
  • From: xray4abc
• On 101st Birthday of Einstein's E=mc2
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: LLiw
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: harry
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• NAME LESS, rambus2005@yahoo.com , who was earlier thrashed at WRAP REALTIVITY FORUM when he BOASTFULLY disclosed himself as Dr In pain of CERN ) , so by fear , he is Nameless , Placeless here).
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Anyone who knows physics can tell the error in your "papers".
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: RP
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: rusty
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: I read Hammond's posts!
  • From: Pete
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: AJAY SHARMA
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: is it possible? (speed of light)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I read Hammond's posts!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: is it possible? (speed of light)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: I read Hammond's posts!
  • From: RMDumse
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I read Hammond's posts!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Aren't they downside up?
  • From: PD
• Re: Aren't they downside up?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: I read Hammond's posts!
  • From: Winnaker Doodle
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Aren't they downside up?
  • From: Barry
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Aren't they downside up?
  • From: Mdmeenken
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: stefanbanev
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Sorcerer
• 100 Years of E=mc2 : A critic is Nameless, Placeless, Identityless ?
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: kill files working beautifully
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: kill files working beautifully
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: harry
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Golden Boar
• Aren't they downside up?
  • From: Barry
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: LLiw
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Phil
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Physicists seek to put one thing in two places
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: PD
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: is it possible? (speed of light)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Age Correspondences, When Both Travelers Accelerate
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: is it possible? (speed of light)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Exercise the Second
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: Exercise the First
  • From: actionintegral
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: PD
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Igor
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: Ajay Sharma
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Sue...
• Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: PD
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Sorcerer
• "money honestly"
  • From: bramar
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: is it possible? (speed of light)
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: PD
• Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: Ajay Sharma
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: rick++
• Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: Ajay Sharma
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: kill files working beautifully
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: kill files working beautifully
  • From: Phil
• Re: kill files working beautifully
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: is it possible? (speed of light)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Phil
• Re: Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: Ajay Sharma
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• is it possible? (speed of light)
  • From: nobody1357
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: shuba
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A CHALLENGE
  • From: Phil
• A CHALLENGE
  • From: vergon
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: gdewilde
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Phil
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Mike
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Mike
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Exercise the First
  • From: YBM
• Re: Exercise the First
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Geometerizing GP-B data ?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Exercise the First
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Pete, Sal's web-site, kst
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Excercise the Third
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Exercise the Second
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Exercise the First
  • From: Sorcerer
• Excercise the Third
  • From: Barry
• Exercise the Second
  • From: Barry
• Exercise the First
  • From: Barry
• Re: kill files working beautifully
  • From: Sorcerer
• kill files working beautifully
  • From: Phil
• Re: Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: devianju
• Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: devianju
• Re: nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: rambus2005
• nAmELeSS : Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: devianju
• Re: Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: rambus2005
• Nameles, Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: devianju
• Re: Rambus2005@yahoo.com put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5), then I will clear other doubts.
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• "Is String Theory Justified?"
  • From: Kow
• Geometerizing GP-B data ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: Rambus2005@yahoo.com give put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5) ,
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: rstokis
• Re: Rambus2005@yahoo.com give put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5) ,
  • From: rstokis
• Re: Rambus2005@yahoo.com give put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5) ,
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: Phil
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: Coordinates and variables
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: Phil
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: Phil
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• rambus2005, will you please stop spamming us with anti-AJAY spam?
  • From: Phil
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: xxein
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: xxein
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• The Twin Paradox versus General Relativity.
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Coordinates and variables
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Coordinates and variables
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Phil
• Echo time in Schwarzschild coordinates/metric
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Coordinates and variables
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Coordinates and variables
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Coordinates and variables
  • From: Phil
• Re: To WACKO , Rambus2005@yahoo.com
  • From: physicsajay
• Coordinates and variables
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: To WACHO , Rambus2005@yahoo.com
  • From: rambus2005
• To WACHO , Rambus2005@yahoo.com
  • From: physicsajay
• To moron Ajay Sharma aka : physicsajay,einnew,devianju, etc, etc
  • From: rambus2005
• Rambus2005@yahoo.com give put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation (1.5) ,
  • From: einnew
• Re: Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?
  • From: Mike
• Ajay Sharma-go spam elswhere
  • From: rambus2005
• Ekpyrotic theory
  • From: Jim O'Reilly
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Rambus2005@yahoo.com give put angle (phi) 89 in the your equation ,
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Rambus2005@yahoo.com take responsibility of irresponsible ABUSING peer reviewed and published work (in international journals and conferences)
  • From: tomson786
• Rambus2005@yahoo.com take responsibility of irresponsible ABUSING peer reviewed and published work (in international journals and conferences)
  • From: tomson786
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Phil
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Phil
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Phil
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Phil
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: universal constant
  • From: Kilogram
• Re: universal constant
  • From: Kilogram
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Kilogram
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Kilogram
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Igor
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Phil
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Actio at Distance, Quantum Encryption and Corollaries
  • From: ny2292000
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: PD
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE -ADDENDUM
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: vergon
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: harry
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: spaceflow
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: PROOF that modern art explains relativity hoax
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Russell
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: xxein
• Re: Alpha Arae is spinning
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Alpha Arae is spinning
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: PROOF that modern art explains relativity hoax
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Alpha Arae is spinning
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Pete
• Re: Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Alpha Arae is spinning
  • From: Sue...
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Mike
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Igor
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: spaceflow
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: PD
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE -ADDENDUM
  • From: PD
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Multiple (physical) Dimensions for dummies (by Ken Udut- simplify3@aol.com)
  • From: simplify3
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sue...
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Mike
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Mike
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?
  • From: Mike
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: spaceflow
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: harry
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE -ADDENDUM
  • From: vergon
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Phil
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: vergon
• About Lagrange in GR II
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: PD
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: PD
• Re: Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: shuba
• Lagrange in GR ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: universal constant
  • From: Igor
• THE BASIC PARTICLE OF THE UNIVERSE
  • From: vergon
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DiRk VaN DeR MoORteL
  • From: Phil
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: harry
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: The restrictions of human perception
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: rambus2005
• Henry Haapalainen are you hidding away?
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New Look on Relativity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• New Look on Relativity
  • From: spaceflow
• Re: The restrictions of human perception
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The restrictions of human perception
  • From: frodo
• Re: The restrictions of human perception
  • From: frodo
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Phil
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The restrictions of human perception
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: universal constant
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The restrictions of human perception
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: How GPS works
  • From: Tom Roberts
• The restrictions of human perception
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: universal constant
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Phil
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• universal constant
  • From: Macaca
• universal constant
  • From: Macaca
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR false?
  • From: shuba
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• How GPS works
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: dlzc
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Igor
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Abuser- Donkey rambus2005@yahoo.com reply scientifically
  • From: fpri
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: dlzc
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: rambus2005
• The donkey is Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: ValeriDvoeglazov- kook
  • From: fpri
• 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: fpri
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Kow
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: harry
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: harry
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• The article refers to the relativity.
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: SR false?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: SR false?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Wacko, wacko, mr. Sharma IS the Donkey
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Donkey, Rambus2005@yahoo.com showed folly in Ajay Sharma’s paper extending Einstein’s E=mc2;
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Randy Poe
• Donkey, Rambus@yahoo.com showed folly in Ajay Sharma’s paper extending Einstein’s E=mc2;
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: PD
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Donkey Rambus, Read 11th Class Physics
  • From: physicsajay
• Birth Day of Einstein’s E=mc2 is approaching.
  • From: ajay2244
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Kow
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: Rebuttal to Ajay Sharma's nonsensical E=Amc^2
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Sorcerer
• Rebuttal to Ajay Sharma's nonsensical E=Amc^2
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
  • From: rambus2005
• Donkey Rambus on move
  • From: devianju
• Re: Ajay Sharma - professional spammer
  • From: devianju
• Question for Androcles (if he's not too scared to answer).
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Contemporary Fundamental Physics (new books)
  • From: valerio2
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: alanmc95210
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: PD
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Ajay Sharma - professional spammer
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: Mike
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: kenseto
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Negab
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR false?
  • From: vergon
• Re: SR false?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
  • From: Mike
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: xxein
• ValeriDvoeglazov- kook
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Einstein and Hilbert: Dark matter
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Einstein and Hilbert: Dark matter
  • From: valerio2
• Re: De Broglie
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR false?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SR false?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: PD
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: effet allais et pioneer
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• SR false?
  • From: Rudolf Drabek
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Mike
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: PD
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: vergon
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: YBM
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Einstein and Poincare book
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A clown with fixed ideas : Ajay Sharma
  • From: physicsajay via NatScience.com
• Nduriri-internet spammer
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Negab
• effet allais et pioneer
  • From: joseph
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Mike
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: Einstein and Poincare book
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A clown with fixed ideas : Ajay Sharma
  • From: josephus
• Re: Paper: Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Paper: Tests of General Fuckwittery from Observing the Double Straw
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Paper: Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Paper: Tests of General Relativity from Timing the Double Pulsar
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A clown with fixed ideas : Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Even a crank like Valeri Dvoeglazov get published
  • From: rambus2005
• Valeri Dvoeglazov gets desperate for attention
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Contemporary Fundamental Physics
  • From: valerio2
• Re: Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website
  • From: valerio2
• Re: Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website
  • From: valeri
• Valeri Dvoeglazov, stop spamming this website
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A clown with fixed ideas : Ajay Sharma
  • From: physicsajay via NatScience.com
• Re: A clown with fixed ideas : Ajay Sharma
  • From: physicsajay via NatScience.com
• Re: Ajay Sharma - a persistent clown
  • From: physicsajay via NatScience.com
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: valeri
• Contemporary Fundamental Physics Series (new books)
  • From: valeri
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein and Poincare book
  • From: valeri
• Re: Einstein and Poincare book
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Einstein and Poincare book
  • From: valeri
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein and Poincare book
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Einstein and Poincare book
  • From: valeri
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: PD
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: josephus
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A clown with fixed ideas : Ajay Sharma
  • From: josephus
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: vergon
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Negab
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Negab
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: QFT and indefinite dimensionality.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Ajay Sharma - a persistent clown
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Mike
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Mike
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Mike
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Mike
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Fresh self-advertisment from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Fresh BS from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Fresh BS from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: PD
• Fresh BS from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Fresh BS from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: PD
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A clown with fixed ideas : Ajay Sharma
  • From: physicsajay via NatScience.com
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma
  • From: devianju
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Mike
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: devianju
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: devianju
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: devianju
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: noshellswill
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: You guys think you're kooks? HAA!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: You guys think you're kooks? HAA!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Relating the reality of a quantized time to GR.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: You guys think you're kooks? HAA!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: You guys think you're kooks? HAA!
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: You guys think you're kooks? HAA!
  • From: jamesahart79
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: robert
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: vergon
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: wugi
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: shevek
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma
  • From: vergon
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: 8 Years Ago
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Mike
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• A clown with fixed ideas : Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: harry
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: harry
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Mike
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: gnygaard
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: kenseto
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma
  • From: physicsajay
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: robert
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: robert
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Negab
• Re: On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Mike
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: vps137
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: yinbing-zhou
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: gnygaard
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 8 Years Ago
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: RP
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is there a Quantum Mechanics group like this one?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: PD
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: PD
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: PD
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: kenseto
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: kenseto
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: harry
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: harry
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: dlzc
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "Weight vs. Mass"?
  • From: gnygaard
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: PD
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: harry
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: vps137
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: PD
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: PD
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: vps137
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: At Very High Rotation Speed
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: devianju
• Re: 8 Years Ago
  • From: Barry
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Classical and modern physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The standards
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The standards
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The standards
  • From: shuba
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• The standards
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Classical and modern physics
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: 8 Years Ago
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sue...
• superlumnal velocities and relativistic mass
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Igor
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: YBM
• Fractal formula for alpha and evolution of e,pi, omega, h, G, N avogadro
  • From: ivars . fabriciuss
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: shevek
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: harry
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: 8 Years Ago
  • From: Barry
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: kenseto
• Re: HOCUS POCUS
  • From: PD
• Re: 8 Years Ago
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• HOCUS POCUS
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Pound-Rebka experiment in Model Mechanics
  • From: PD
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Y.Porat
• THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
  • From: vergon
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: vps137
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: Sorcerer
• Lorentz factor in GR?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: the black fishing hole
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• dark matter and 'theory of everything'
  • From: robert
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: At Very High Rotation Speed
  • From: franckspike
• Re: What on Earth is this?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: At Very High Rotation Speed
  • From: Barry
• Re: At Very High Rotation Speed
  • From: Barry
• Re: At Very High Rotation Speed
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: What on Earth is this?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: At Very High Rotation Speed
  • From: Sorcerer
• At Very High Rotation Speed
  • From: franckspike
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: 8 Years Ago
  • From: Sorcerer
• 8 Years Ago
  • From: Barry
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Mass increases, when light energy is emitted- a new cretinism from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Negab
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: PD
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Pound-Rebka experiment in Model Mechanics
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Pound-Rebka experiment in Model Mechanics
  • From: PD
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What on Earth is this?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: singulerity
  • From: frodo
• Re: singulerity
  • From: frodo
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What on Earth is this?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What on Earth is this?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: What on Earth is this?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Golden Boar
• From here to Aeternity...
  • From: Edward Green
• What on Earth is this?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Igor
• Re: singulerity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: Entropy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Gravity solved with the quadratic formula
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Barry
• Entropy
  • From: Barry
• Re: Gravity solved with the quadratic equation
  • From: Sue...
• Gravity solved with the quadratic formula
  • From: virtualadepts
• Gravity solved with the quadratic equation
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: jem
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Sue...
• singulerity
  • From: frodo
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Ym
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Gravity pwned.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Mike
• The speed of a photon in a gravitational field
  • From: Phil Gardner
• Re: Gravity pwned.
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Gravity pwned.
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Gravity pwned.
  • From: virtualadepts
• Gravity pwned.
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: From OPRAH and WALL STREET JOURNAL !
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• From OPRAH and WALL STREET JOURNAL !
  • From: suzan . shepherd
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Igor
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Igor
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Mike
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Quantum Leaps and Zeno's Paradox
  • From: Barry
• Re: Peristalsis
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Peristalsis
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Sue...
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: jem
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: jem
• Sorcerer v Phuckwits
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Peristalsis
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Ym
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Sorcerer alias Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: spinning laser experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: spinning laser experiment
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sorcerer alias Tom Roberts
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: shevek
• Re: Sorcerer alias Tom Roberts
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sorcerer alias Tom Roberts
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Sorcerer alias Tom Roberts
  • From: Sorcerer
• Sorcerer alias Tom Roberts
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Sue...
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Igor
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: b92057
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Gravity is a chain reaction within an equilibrium of entropy & chaos.
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: Gravity is a chain reaction within an equilibrium of chaos and entropy... The repost!
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: PD
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: PD
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Ym
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Gravity is a chain reaction within an equilibrium of chaos and entropy... The repost!
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: harry
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Sue...
• Gravity is a chain reaction within an equilibrium of chaos and entropy... The repost!
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: spinning laser experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: converting vectors
  • From: Eric Gisse
• converting vectors
  • From: payam
• Re: spinning laser experiment
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: New theory: Space is not curved. It is logarithmic.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What makes something compeling?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• RELATIVISTIC MASS
  • From: vergon
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What makes something compeling?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What makes something compeling?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: What makes something compeling?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Rotating Pulsars and active galaxy black hole rotation
  • From: marsfossils
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: thoovler
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Mike
• Re: spinning laser experiment
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: spinning laser experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: spinning laser experiment
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What makes something compeling?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: harry
• Re: spinning laser experiment
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What makes something compeling?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• spinning laser experiment
  • From: Tom
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: PD
• Re: Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• What makes something compeling?
  • From: ajiko
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: PD
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Ym
• Massless Photon Obsolete?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: tomgee
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: physics . einstein
• 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: tomgee
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Ajay Sharma - from idiocies to outright lying
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma progresses from writing idiocies to outright lying
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma progresses from writing idiocies to outright lying
  • From: rambus2005
• 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: physics . einstein
• Donkey RAMBUS show some sense
  • From: physics . einstein
• Donkey RAMBUS show some sense
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Donkey RAMBUS show some sense
  • From: physics . einstein
• Ajay Sharma - immortal fumbles
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma debunks his own cretinisms-immortal fumbles for DvM list
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma continues to debunk his own idiocies.
  • From: rambus2005
• Foolish donkey RAMBUS posing intelligent
  • From: physics . einstein
• Foolish donkey RAMBUS posing intelligent
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: harry
• FOOLSIH DONKEY sits in public after being beaten
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Ajay Sharma's llatest idiocy : "mass depends upon angle"
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma helps debunk his own shit
  • From: rambus2005
• Donkeys sees SUN AT NIGHT
  • From: physics . einstein
• Ajay Sharma debunks himself
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ajay Sharma debunked
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ajay Sharma debunked
  • From: physics . einstein
• Foolish donkey RAMBUS posing intelligent
  • From: physics . einstein
• Ajay Sharma, helps debunking his own idiocies
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma debunked
  • From: rambus2005
• "Gravity"
  • From: Ym
• Foolish donkey posing intelligent
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: jem
• DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: harry
• Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: JanPB
• Re: IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Foremost imbecile, Ajay Sharma persists in his lying
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Cretin Ajay Sharma persists in his scam
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• IS EVERYTHING RELATIVE ?
  • From: Stamenin
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Cretin Ajay Sharma kees going
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Symmetry between Space and Time
  • From: Barry
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Donkey RAMBUS changes his stand.
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Edward Green
• Donkey RAMBUS cahnges stand.
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: A Symmetry between Space and Time
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• What really happens at the Schwarzschild singularity?
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Error in Weisstein's redshift
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: White Holes are time-reversed black holes?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: harry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: harry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A Symmetry between Space and Time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: shevek
• Poincare Group Not Complete Yet, Overlooked Symmetries Of Lorentz/4+1 Spacetime
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Igor
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: PD
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: PD
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: PD
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Ajay Sharma does a superb job refuting his "paper"
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma keeps pushing his idiocies refuting himself
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Unification?
  • From: kenseto
• Universal Donkey RAMBUS2005@yahoo.com
  • From: physics . einstein
• Universal Donkey RAMBUS2005@yahoo.com
  • From: physics . einstein
• Universal Donkey RAMBUS
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: dlzc
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: tomgee
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: shevek
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma, moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Special Donkey RAMBUS
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Barry
• A Symmetry between Space and Time
  • From: Barry
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: TymBuk2
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: jem
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Ym
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: A metric gravity without curved space
  • From: ajiko
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: harry
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Wilson
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• More cretinisms from Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: JanPB
• Re: More idiocies from Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The stupidity of Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• More idiocies from Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Barry
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Barry
• Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• More and bigger stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Doubt : Newton's Second Law
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A metric gravity without curved space
  • From: xxein
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Barry
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Barry
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Barry
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Barry
• !!!!!!!???????!!!!!!!!
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Barry
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Mike
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: wugi
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: More stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Barry
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• More stupidities from Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: physics . einstein
• Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: oriel36
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma, persistently wrong
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: fpri
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Golden Boar
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Ym
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: jem
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: jem
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Superluminal communication does not result in the causal loop
  • From: gashan1971
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Joe Jakarta
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Light Beam and Time Stream
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: tomgee
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Light Beam and Time Stream
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Peri of Pera
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A metric gravity without curved space
  • From: ajiko
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A metric gravity without curved space
  • From: ajiko
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, MATHEMATICALLY INCONSISTENT
  • From: fpri
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: fpri
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: fpri
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: fpri
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: tomgee
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A metric gravity without curved space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• THE MASSLESS PHOTON
  • From: vergon
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Unification?
  • From: vergon
• Re: Unification?
  • From: vergon
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Barry
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: time detector
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: A metric gravity without curved space
  • From: xxein
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: xxein
• Re: The stupidity of Androcles
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: xxein
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Newton's Universe
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A nice joke for a change
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• A nice joke for a change
  • From: Mike
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Mike
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Mike
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Mike
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Mike
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Mike
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Mike
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Unification?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Ajay Sharma , self advertising moron
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• re: relativity of time
  • From: paco1955
• Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Ajay Sharma , self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Unification?
  • From: Gert Baars
• A metric gravity without curved space
  • From: ajiko
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: sandeshavadhani
• Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Unification?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: physics . einstein
• Newton's Universe
  • From: Barry
• Re: Unification?
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Light Beam and Time Stream
  • From: Sorcerer
• Why doesn't everything happen all at once?
  • From: Barry
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Toob
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: xxein
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Sorcerer
• Light Beam and Time Stream
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity of time
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• The Trouble with Physic(ist)s is that they are Not Even Wrong
  • From: LEJ Brouwer
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: FrediFizzx
• relativity of time
  • From: paco1955
• Birth of Universe, the secret is in the explosion: Propositon #5
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: JanPB
• The stupidity of Denis.Sjostrom
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Brass Monkey doesn't know what 'constant' means.
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: time detector
  • From: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
• Re: Adrocles shows he does not know what distance is.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The stupidity of Androcles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Adrocles shows he does not know what distance is.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Unification?
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Unification?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Unification?
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Unification?
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Unification?
  • From: Gert Baars
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: The stupidity of Androcles
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: breaking news from CERN ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: breaking news from CERN ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: time detector
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: schoenfeld . one
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: breaking news from CERN ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Many Solutions to Einstein Field Equations in Vacuum
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: time detector
  • From: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
• Re: The stupidity of Bilewacky
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The stupidity of Ghost
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Androcles
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: JanPB
• Re: The stupidity of Brass Boor
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: JanPB
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: xxein
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: thoovler
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: JanPB
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Ajay Sharma, self advertising moron
  • From: rambus2005
• 100 Years of E=mc2 by the well-known moron, Ajay Sharma
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Igor
• The stupidity of Androcles
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: breaking news from CERN ...
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: What is time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Igor
• Re: 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• 100 Years of E=mc2
  • From: physics . einstein
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: stefanbanev
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Our Heavenly Father on 12-29-04
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Our Heavenly Father on 12-29-04
  • From: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• breaking news from CERN ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: YBM
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: jem
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Our Heavenly Father on 12-29-04
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: Tom S.
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Our Heavenly Father on 12-29-04
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• SR Unverifiability - GR falsifiability
  • From: Mike
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: socratus
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Randy M. Dumse
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity is a chain reaction within an equilibrium of entropy & chaos.
  • From: guskz@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Our Heavenly Father on 12-29-04
  • From: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
  • From: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
• Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
  • From: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: xxein
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: xxein
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
  • From: Ronald 'More-More' Moshki
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Our Heavenly Father on 12-29-04
  • From: cattheon
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: What is time?
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: qchiang2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
  • From: Brian Fletcher
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is time?
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
  • From: ZenIsWhen
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Igor
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: jcon
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Harry
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Igor
• Re: About time
  • From: Danny Dot
• Re: Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv
  • From: Igor
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: On the prior Definition of the Meter and the Inaccuracies therein
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: The Rotating Disk
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: PD
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: dlzc
• Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: What is time?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: On the prior Definition of the Meter and the Inaccuracies therein
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
  • From: Barry
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Sorcerer
• Dirac Gamma matrices including gamma^5, and the Spacetime Metric g_uv
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: PD
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page (was: What become...)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: jem
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Harry
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page (was: What become...)
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: An Explanation of Dayton Miller's Anomalous "Ether Drift" Result
  • From: oriel36
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: oriel36
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page (was: What become...)
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Jeff
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: Jeff
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: Jeff
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Harry
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Harry
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: xilog
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: JanPB
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: JanPB
• I need a philosophical opinion ...
  • From: Denis . Sjostrom
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: JanPB
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Spacetime and Gravitation Based on Logic, instead of Einstein Assumptions
  • From: xxein
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: The Rotating Disk as a TARDIS
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: Photon bend another photon
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
• Re: String Theory Humor & The Triumph of Moving Dimensions Theory: arxiv.org--HA HA AHAH HAHAHAHAHAH HA HA AHAH!!!
  • From: Jeff
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: Jeff
• Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry
• Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Evidences for the ether
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: PD
• Re: About time
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• people_v_Baez webpage removed?
  • From: e_erpelding
• Re: About time
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Sorcerer
• Re: Comments on my FAQ page (was: What become...)
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: What become the LT transforms if the speed of light depends on the observers' velocity ?
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: rambus2005
• Re: What is the first law of Universe ?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Even cranks get published
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
  • From: Barry