Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- From: Barry <sasalobo@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:01:11 -0500
PD wrote:
Barry wrote:
The so called "time" coordinate in spacetime can be replaced by a
spatial coordinate without loss of meaning.
If this were true, wouldn't this demand a Euclidean metric?
No. We can use whatever metric we like.
The idea is not to change the maths per se, but to change the interpretation/meaning, without affecting the fundamentals.
Some posters claim they only want to discuss only the "fundamentals", but they don't yet understand that the "fundamentals" haven't been changed.
I don't think that they want to think about it too deeply.
It's the same fundamentals, with what appears to be just a correction in terminology, but avoiding some pitfalls.
And with fascinating glimpses of a space/time symmetry that spacetime completely misses as far as I can see.
Barry
Barry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- From: PD
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- References:
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- From: Barry
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- From: PD
- Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- Prev by Date: Re: A Symmetric Twins Conundrum
- Next by Date: Re: people_v_Baez webpage removed?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- Next by thread: Re: Is "Spacetime" a misnomer?
- Index(es):