Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- From: Barry <sasalobo@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 12:05:16 -0500
Sue... wrote:
Barry wrote:
In special relativity there are three reasons given for why an object
can't go FTL relative to an inertial frame.
Where is that stated in SR ?
I didn't say that it was "stated in SR". In fact I don't believe that a restriction to below light speed necessarily follows from the postulates of SR.
What I was suggesting in my post was that SR, per se, does not restrict relative velocities, and that it certainly does not state any reasons for such restriction.
If you read what I wrote you will see that I'm contending that it is just certain particular mathematical interpretations of SR that lead to that conclusion.
I have said that there are three reasons given, and that in my opinion they are due to fundamentally inaccurate mathematical representations.
If you think that those three reasons haven't been given for this hypothetical velocity restriction or that more than three reasons are given, please be specific.
Barry
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- From: Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- From: Sue...
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- References:
- Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- From: Barry
- Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- From: Sue...
- Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- Prev by Date: Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
- Next by Date: Re: The Rotating Disk
- Previous by thread: Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- Next by thread: Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|