Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
- From: "Brian Fletcher" <brianf88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 23:05:43 GMT
"George Hammond" <Nowhere1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qP%Jg.4197$xQ1.122@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"George Hammond" <nowhere1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:ec0hf2pfchnp4mtde7g5ls9ivppiq9nhnu@xxxxxxxxxx
GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
In 1912 Impressionist Marcel Duchamp exhibited a
painting entitled NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE.
The painting created a sensation. Worth millions today
it is held by the Philadelphia Museum of Art.
A photo of it may be seen at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nude_Descending_a_Staircase
==========================================
The explanation of exactly why this painting
is so famous has always been a mystery.
==========================================
A number of art experts have pointed out that the painting
is similar to one of Edward Muybridge's then novel and
famous "stop motion" photographs entitled "Nude Descending
Stairs" (1887) which may be seen here:
http://www.geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/duchamppainting.JPG
In the above URL I have separately cut and pasted 3 of
Muybridge's still frames together to simulate Duchamp's
painting... note the STRIKING similarity! This fact was
even publicly acknowledged by Duchamp himself according to
the Wikipedia article cited above.
Of course Duchamp's painting "impressionistically" adds
a sense of motion to the figure which is missing in
Muybridge's still-frame photos.
=========================================
HOWEVER..... the fact that Duchamp got his inspiration
from one of Muybridge's photographs IS NOT WHY
Duchamp's painting is WORLD FAMOUS.
THERE IS ANOTHER SCIENTIFIC REASON
FOR THE WORLD FAME OF
MARCEL DUCHAMP'S PAINTING---
FACT IS...... THE PAINTING IS A DIRECT
VISUAL CONFIRMATION OF THE
EXISTENCE OF GOD.................!!!!!
AND HERE I WILL EXPLAIN WHY:
=========================================
When you look at something new and unfamiliar,
your mind tries to "logically guess" what it is.... then
your mind imagines the object and tries to fit that image
to what it is seeing to see if they can be matched.
For instance, if you are out hunting and you see a
distant object which you think might be a deer, you
must check carefully before you shoot. Your mind
tries different possibilities... is it a man?.... so you try
to fit the object to the mental image of a man.... no...
it won't work.... is it a cow?.... so you try to fit the
object to a cow.... no, can't be.... is it a large dog....
so you imagine it as a large dog.... nope.... won't
work.....is it a scarecrow...so you try to imagine it as a
scarecrow..nope.... wrong again.... wait a minute.... it
could be a motorcycle parked on the side of a dirt road....
immediately you imagine a motorcycle... with a wind shield
and handle bars......... BINGO....... turns out that's
exactly what it is......... thank God you didn't pull that
trigger!
WELL.... it turns out almost all objects are "partially
invisible"..... as I have explained before, in fact about
20% of true reality is INVISIBLE to the average person
due to the Secular Trend Braingrowth Deficit... and
this is known as the "Invisible World" of Religion
(commonly called "Heaven").
What this means is that we are constantly using the
above described "GUESS AND COMPARE" method
of recognizing objects (and persons too by the way).
In fact it is this fundamental "guess and compare"
method which is what eventually leads the average person
to begin to suspect that there is an "unseen world"..
at least historically that is where Religion comes from.
Now... in fact.... the human visual system does this
automatically and very rapidly... trying in some
cases 3, 4 or half a dozen "guesses" before it
recognizes an unfamiliar object or person.
This (subconscious) process looks very much
like one of Muybridges "freeze motion" photos...
or like Duchamp's Nude Descending the Staircase
for that matter.
AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHY
the average person gets an overwhelming
sense of DEJA VUE the minute he first see's
Marcel Duchamp's famous painting.... he says to
himself... "hey..I've see that somewhere before.."
... and guess what.... he has.. in his subconscious mind,
and what it is is :
TWO PICTURES... ONE OF HEAVEN
(an extrapolated possibility) AND ONE OF
EARTH (a known reality).... BEING
QUICLY ALTERNATED FOR COMPARISON
BACK AND FORTH IN THE MIND !!!!
........... and that is
EXACTLY HOW
THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
WAS DISCOVERED
NOT ONLY HISTORICALLY,
BUT BY AVERAGE PEOPLE
EVERY SINGLE DAY !
Of course Duchamp is also a pop psychologist and
that is why the figure is "descending a staircase"
because the vision of God is all about ascending
and descending (perceptually) and "stairs" are
a well known historical symbology (ladders too).
also... a "nude" is used to involve the basic
"perceptual ascension" involved in sexual
desire and attraction.
However... the "movie film sequence"
of the jittery "glimpses of heaven" that
we undergoe daily when perceiving
unfamiliar objects or scenes is BRILLIANTLY
captured by Duchamp's famous painting.
and that is why Marcel Duchamp's
painting is world famous !
You have described an accurate phenomenon of the brain at work. In the movie
"What The Bleep Do We Know" on of the Harvard professors described his view
of what happened to the natives when the first fleet appeared on the horizon
for the first time. They had no referenece point, so they couldnt see the
ships, and it took a sharman to "open their eyes".
How many layers of existence do you have to discover to "prove" God ? Even
proof of afterlife or any metaphysical demonstration proves only what is
available now, and that is "life" .
To attempt to prove God is to attempt to prove proof.
What we individually discover, adds to what we each know, and that discovery
trail is endless.
I cant prove it, but dont have to many who already "get it".
BOfL
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- Next by Date: Re: Three Relativistic Reasons That We can't go FTL
- Previous by thread: Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
- Next by thread: Re: GOD=G_uv=NUDE DESCENDING A STAIRCASE
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
