Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...


<Denis.Sjostrom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1157087322.970350.153340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would be delighted if someone smarter than me would tear apart my
little thesis (I am not formally educated.) My maths skills are borken
... i apologise for my esoteric notation, it's a bit cantoresque and I
dentote chaitins omega differently (with reason) ...

I have posted it here ...
http://au.geocities.com/themooproject/index.htm

Personally, I think I know what it was about QM that bugged Einstein
so! Please read my whole argument before assuming I am wrong. Once you
have read it, then you may write me of as a crank at your leisure.

You will immediately deduce that I am not a COMPLETE fool when you open
the page, for three reasons :

- It isn't in purple or yellow on black text

- there are no animated gifs (in fact there are no diagrams or images
at all, just set theory)

- while some of my conclusions are a almost completely counter to
conventional wisdom on certain subjects, my predictions are not
themselves ridiculous. IE:

... I suspect that it is absolutely impossible to build an antigravity
machine. Matter can have no effect on spacetime aside from posessing
mass-energy ... I'm not entirely sure of this, but I have a pretty darn
strong hunch I can explain why ... (the argument is not in my paper,
it's still just a hunch, I am not entirely preprared to assert it yet)

in short : THERE ARE NO UFOS!!! :)

*shrug* enjoy my preposterous little notion... laugh yourself silly in
fact :)


Read the first line: 'Quantum mechanics (QM) and general relativity (GR) can
never be reconciled'. Wrong. Learn the facts then repost:
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9512024

Your second remark 'Any theoretical physicist with an advanced degree in
hyperbolic topology should have figured that much out by now.' pretty much
labels you for what you are. When you decide to be less sarcastic and
actually engage in reasoned discussion you will get a lot further.

Bill


.

Quantcast