Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...

<Denis.Sjostrom@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1157107889.669305.226400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hmm, i was thinking about your query. Formally, I define spacetime as
an infinite, irreducibly complex object with possibly infinite fractal
dimensionality :) String theorists are rather preoccupied with the
number 11 at the moment, but I can't see why our universe must have
some nice whole number of dimensions. Benoit Mandelbrot has shown us
objects with fractional dimensionality ... why not infinite ? :)

make any sense at all?

Somewhat at the scale of the very small. Especially if quantum objects
are point-like entities in a complex interaction scenario. This goes
one step down from orthodox superstring theory where we have point-like
entities making strings due to quantum "vacuum" and relativistic
effects. This allows for a kind of "current" within the string.
Something superstring theory doesn't have. However, 3D space and time
must be emergent from this concept macroscopically. In fact, you can
look at our hexagonal Spin Matrix concept in the papers in the links
below to find fractal behavior of the geometry of interactions.
However, our Spin Matrix is a 2D event horizon boundary between two
3-branes that are partially intersecting. The merging of two
spacetimes, so added complexity.

Go watch the movie the matrix (if you haven't already) then consider
an
infinite series of "matrices" inside each other, that all conatin the
original "matrix" - *grin* an infintely large closed loop. It's the
best analogy I can come up with for the object I am trying to
describe!
Apologies or the cheap pop culture reference ...

This maybe goes to what the "point-like entities" might be? ;-) "When
will Earthlings understand that size doesn't matter." --Alien in Men In
Black

Could there be a whole 'nother Universe in our point-like entities? ;-)

FrediFizzx

Quantum Vacuum Charge papers;
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.pdf
or postscript
http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/quantum_vacuum_charge.ps
http://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0601110
http://www.vacuum-physics.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: infinity
    ... >>> Why are you assuming that there is a longest word in the language? ... >> finite, that means none are infinite, therefore S^L is not infinite either. ... > I am not assuming that there is a longest word. ... > the maximum string length, i.e. the largest finite natural number. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: .99999... still=/= 1
    ... >>2) The point of reference means how we define the counting results ... the string length and the members in the placeholders of the string. ... Note that supernatural numbers are that I have called earlier infinite ... omega 1 is behind our standard infinity in the next infinity. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Logarithm of transfinite numbers
    ... or the value of the string I am discussing. ... There is no point at which any finite natural has an infinite ... They ARE the finite naturals. ... At which point has my abstraction differed from what you're ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Logarithm of transfinite numbers
    ... Tony Orlow wrote: ... Can all 1's up to any finite position represent an infinite ... There is no infinite position in the string. ... And no sum ending at M represents the sum over the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability
    ... as is true for the other 9 digits, and finally, reminded you that my infinite ... The center-infinite string has its left string all zeros, ... that can't be determined in such an infinite division. ... and if you have any memory of the response which I describe ...
    (sci.math)