Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 15:43:07 +0200
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
In sci.physics.relativity, Paul B. Andersen
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:53:34 +0200
<edi3of$8j9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
The Ghost In The Machine wrote:In sci.physics.relativity, Paul B. AndersenRight.
<paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:33:19 +0200
<ed6of0$qjj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Sorcerer wrote:[snip]"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:ed47qc$mts$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------------Erm...pedant point. Satellite clocks are not adjusted at all.
The clock in each satellite is synced to GPS-time once a day.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Instead, a delta is published once a day, which the satellite
publishes but otherwise ignores to the handheld ground-based units.
At least, such is my understanding.
But I have to simplify when discussing with idiots like Androcles. :-)
You might say that the time reported by the satellite
(which is the clock time together with the clock offset),
is corrected once a day.
Paul
True. :-) In any event, it simplifies the design;
all clocks can simply freerun, as opposed to requiring
some sort of "frequency steering logic".
However, were they to freerun at the wrong rate, then just
before the synchronization (if one takes a measurement
at 23:59 and the synch is done at 00:00 Zulu, say), one
gets a measurement error from each clock of about
3.8 * 10^-5 * 3 * 10^8 = 11.4 km. Since the spaceclocks
are running fast in this scenario the measurement point
would likely be suspended somewhere in midair, assuming
a solution to the question "Where Am I?" is even possible.
Since the error is usually touted as being 100m at most
for the civilians (and 10m for the military), this gets
slightly ridiculous quickly, especially since GPS units
(with maps) are for sale at many outlets.
The CA precision of 100 metres was with the selective
availability on (intentional degrading of the precision).
This has been switched off since May 2000, so now
the precision is nominally 30 metres, actually better
than 10 metres.
http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/FGCS/info/sans_SA/compare/ERLA.htm
Paul
.
- References:
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Evidences for the ether
- Prev by Date: Re: OWLS Without Absolute Synchronization
- Next by Date: A Symmetry between Space and Time
- Previous by thread: Re: Evidences for the ether
- Next by thread: Re: Evidences for the ether
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|