Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: "kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:08:01 GMT
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:T8zMg.136560$LF4.126816@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:dial
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rEyMg.136554$LF4.102421@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
Sure it is a clock.....but it is not as accurate as an atomic clock.
What makes one clock more accurate than another?
The frequency in the sun dial clock is not very repeatable. Also a sun
carriedclock is not available in different frames. An atomic clock can be
to different frames.
How do you suppose you could determine whether the frequency of a clock
is repeatable?
You compare a number of them to see if they show the same elapsed time after
a while.
You really think a clock's accuracy is a function of how easy it is to
carry it?
No but we were talking about a sundial clock vs an atomic clock.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- References:
- DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sue...
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Prev by Date: Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
- Next by Date: Re: RELATIVISTIC MASS
- Previous by thread: Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Next by thread: Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|