Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Mike Fontenot <mlfasf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:46:55 -0600
Nicolaas Vroom wrote:
Question:
Is it possible to explain the Twin Experiment from the moving point of view?
Yes it is. For example, take gamma = 2 (v = 0.866), and let the
traverler reverse course when he is 10 years old. Then, during
each of the constant-speed legs, the traveler will conclude that
the home twin ages 5 years. But the traveler also concludes
that the home twin's age increases 30 years during the traveler's
turnaround. So the traveler concludes that the home twin ages
a total of 5 + 30 + 5 = 40 years during his entire trip.
You can therefore plot the home twin's age (according to the
traveler), versus the traveler's age. Starting from the origin,
the curve is a straight line of slope 1/2, until the traveler's
age reaches 10 (and the home twin's age is 5). The curve then
jumps vertically from 5 to 35 years old, and then continues as
a straight line of slope 1/2, ending at the endpoint (20, 40).
For the standard twin paradox problem,
the amount of the sudden increase in the home twin's age (according
to the traveler), when the traveler changes speed, can be INFERRED
simply from the fact that the home twin is 40, and the traveler is
20, when they are reunited (together with the fact that the traveler
concludes that the home twin ages half as much as he does during the
two constant-speed legs of the trip). But for more complicated
scenarios, it is necessary to be able to DIRECTLY COMPUTE the
amount of the sudden increase of the home twin's age when the
traveler changes speed. In a previous posting, I explained how
this can be done. Here is that posting:
_______________________________________________________________
Years ago, I derived a simple equation that
relates the current ages of the twins, ACCORDING
TO EACH TWIN. Over the years, I have found it to
be very useful. Originally, I inferred the equation
while staring at a Minkowski diagram. Then later, I
derived it formally from the Lorentz equations.
To save writing, I write "the
current age of a distant object" (where the
"distant object" is the stay-at-home twin) as
the "CADO". The CADO has a value for each age t of
the traveling twin, written CADO(t). The traveler
and the stay-at-home twin come to DIFFERENT conclusions
about CADO(t), at any given age t of the traveler.
Denote the traveler's conclusion as CADO_T(t), and
the stay-at-home twin's conclusion as CADO_H(t).
(And in both cases, remember that CADO(t) is the age of
the home twin, and t is the age of the traveler).
My simple equation says that
CADO_T(t) = CADO_H(t) - L*v/(c*c),
where
L is their current distance apart, in lightyears,
according to the home twin,
and
v is their current relative speed, in lightyears/year,
according to the home twin. v is positive
when the twins are moving apart.
(Although the dependence is not shown explicitly
in the above equation, the quantities L and v are
to be considered functions of t, the age of the
traveler).
The factor (c*c) has value 1 for these units, and
is needed only to make the dimensionality correct.
The equation explicitly shows how the home twin's
age will change abruptly (according to the traveler,
not the home twin), whenever the relative
speed changes abruptly.
For example, suppose the home twin believes that she
is 40 when the traveler is 20, immediately before
he turns around. So CADO_H(20-) = 40. (Denote his
age immediately before the turnaround as t = 20-,
and immediately after the turnaround as t = 20+.)
Suppose they are 30 ly apart (according to the home
twin), and that their relative speed is +0.9 ly/y (i.e.,
0.9c), when the traveler's age is 20-. Then the traveler
will conclude that the home twin is
CADO_T(20-) = 40 - 0.9*30 = 13 years old
immediately before his turnaround.
Immediately after his turnaround (assumed here
to occur in zero time), their relative speed
is -0.9 ly/y.
The home twin concludes that their distance apart
doesn't change during the turnaround: it's
still 30 ly.
And the home twin concludes that
neither of them ages during the turnaround,
so that CADO_H(20+) is still 40.
But according to the traveler,
CADO_T(20+) = 40 - (-0.9)*30 = 67 years old,
so he concludes that his twin ages 54 years
during his instantaneous turnaround.
In the usual traveling twin scenario, the sudden
change in speed is a negative change: i.e., the
relative speed decreases (becomes more negative, or
less positive), changing from +V to -V (with the
convention that v is positive when the traveler is
moving away from his twin). But note that, if the
sudden speed change is positive, the CADO equation
says that the traveler will then conclude that
his twin suddenly gets YOUNGER, not older.
Since the relative speed v can vary between -1 and +1
lightyear/year, an instantaneous speed change can
be as large as -2 or +2 lightyears/year. So the
CADO equation says that CADO_T can instantaneously
increase or decrease by as much, in years, as
twice the separation L, in lightyears.
For example, if the twins are 30 lightyears apart,
(according to the home twin), then the home twin's
age (according to the traveling twin) can
instantaneously change (positively or negatively) by
as much as 60 years.
The CADO equation works for arbitrary accelerations,
not just the idealized instantaneous speed changes
assumed above. When the separation is sufficiently
great, even 1-g accelerations can produce rapid
changes (positive and negative) in the current age of
the home twin (according to the traveler). The home
twin's maximum (in magnitude) rate of ageing is greater
than the traveler's rate of ageing by a factor
approximately numerically equal to their separation L,
in lightyears. If the traveler is accelerating TOWARD
the home twin, she will be getting older at that
(maximum) rate. If the traveler is accelerating AWAY
from her, she will be getting younger at that (maximum)
rate.
The home twin does not agree with the traveler's
conclusions about their corresponding ages. She
certainly doesn't perceive that the progression of her
own life is in any way affected by the traveler's
accelerations. But the differing conclusions are equally
valid: neither twin is "more correct" than the other,
and neither twin can adopt the other's conclusions
without contradicting their own measurements.
I've got an example with 1-g accelerations
on my web page:
http://home.comcast.net/~mlfasf
The derivation of the CADO equation is given in my paper
"Accelerated Observers in Special Relativity",
PHYSICS ESSAYS, December 1999, p629.
Mike Fontenot
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- References:
- The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Nicolaas Vroom
- The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Next by Date: Re: Einstein speculated E =mc2 from L =mc2 in Sep. 1905 : Ajay Sharma
- Previous by thread: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Next by thread: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
