Re: dark matter and 'theory of everything'


However, this a just, would be an absolute limitation this theory of
everything, as it would a definitely correspond to any situation along
which, for instance, the quantum wavelike as an aspects of a particles would
be a just a negligible matter, as it would be an exactitude of a
ressemblence along a behaviors among the quantum mechanics and the Newtonian
mechanics relationships among also an old and a new theories, along which
would be a provided an extreme limitations.

Therefore, as it would make to turn around the theories of a motion and the
one of a gravity, which they would be used exactly as a three hundred years
old theories, which they do not behave as a time does.

However, an ultimate theory of everything, would be a just as a limitation
along that matter, which would describe, for instance, a motion at a speeds
less than a speed of light in an extreme weak gravity along which a quantum
wavelike of a mass would be negligible, and this thing has had been done a
long time ago, a definitely as a matter a fact

--
Ahmed Ouahi, Architect
Best Regards!


"robert" <roberto_ruggeri_@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NMbOg.11724$cx.10198@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"shevek" <shevek4@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158080566.876582.230370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

robert wrote:
Has the discovery of dark matter and dark energy demolished our chances
of
finding a "theory of everything" any time soon -

No, there will of course never be anything like a "theory of
everything", at least not in a meaningful sense. Elementary logic
tells you that as the sphere of knowledge increases the surface area of
the unknown increases with it. But don't put that in your grant
proposal, it won't look good with the part about the philosopher's
stone.

I think it /may/ be possible to have a theory that explains everything we
see. The question is, there may always be something there that we don't
know about and can't ever see. But as long as we can describe what we can
see, that should be good enough for me!



as I understand it string
theorists say they are close(ish) to finding such a theory, but all
our
theories to date (including quantum mechanics and special relativity as
well
as string theory) are only able to describe 4% of reality (or have I
(hopefully) got it wrong and dark matter/energy can be explained by
'one
of
the above')?



"Dark energy" and "dark matter" represent part of this surface area of
the unknown. Postulating the existence of cold dark matter (in certain
very high densities in the halos of galaxies) helps to explain things
like the rotational speed vs. radius curves of galaxies, which don't
match the prediction of general relativity.

However this is still very much a mystery, one that when solved will
give us more interesting mysteries to solve.

As Feynman once said, reality is like an onion - as soon as you peel of a
layer there's another layer to unravel. It may be possible though that
we'll get to the centre of the onion (but as I said above, who's to say
there's not an invisible onion we'll never know about).

Roberto.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can I set a task to be "timeless"?
    ... JTZedak wrote: ... matter when it's done. ... "timeless", so that it is listed as something to be done, but it doesn't have ... limitation that it takes a finite amount of time. ...
    (microsoft.public.project)
  • RE: build error - locked file
    ... ASP.NET 2.0, there is no longer such limitation, since no matter the ... Microsoft MSDN Online Support Lead ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: We shall make matter out of energy
    ... >> We shall make matter out of energy, ... >> this new technology we shall have everything, and our only limitation ...
    (sci.physics)