Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: "kenseto" <kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:10:55 GMT
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wKSNg.138368$LF4.66932@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:varying
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:S6yNg.138313$LF4.76625@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
jem wrote:
kenseto wrote:
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:KadNg.136674$LF4.94046@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
jem wrote:
kenseto wrote:
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lVTMg.136601$LF4.131391@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
Sigh....you have to compare different type of clocks to determine what
clock
is the most accurate.
OK, so if you compare two different types of clocks and they show
different elapsed times, which one is the more accurate?
Has that one got you stumped, Seto?
No.....if you have two types of clocks the type that shows a higher
amount of elapsed time is less accurate.
Wow! You did it! You said something sensible. I'm speechless.
ROTFLOL....Don't pat yourself on the back yet. You failed to realize that
what I said is circular. We would not use any type of instruement as a clock
that record a varying amount of elapsed time when they are side by side.
Wow!!!! Another misinterpretation by an SRian.:-)
Ken Seto.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- References:
- DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Prev by Date: Re: Lorentz transformation, a fundamental contradiction?
- Next by Date: Re: Classical and modern physics
- Previous by thread: Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Next by thread: Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|