Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem <xxx@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 08:19:22 -0400
kenseto wrote:
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WRbOg.138437$LF4.23036@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wKSNg.138368$LF4.66932@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
"jem" <xxx@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:S6yNg.138313$LF4.76625@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
No.....if you have two types of clocks the type that shows a higher
varying
amount of elapsed time is less accurate.
Wow! You did it! You said something sensible. I'm speechless.
ROTFLOL....Don't pat yourself on the back yet.
I was patting *you* on the back, Seto. You probably didn't realize it
because you're so used to being patted on the head.
You are an idiot.
For thinking it appropriate to pat you on the back for anything you said - yes, no doubt.
You failed to realize that
what I said is circular. We would not use any type of instruement as a
clock
that record a varying amount of elapsed time when they are side by side.
Wow!!!! Another misinterpretation by an SRian.:-)
Well, your maiden voyage into those uncharted waters of rationality sure
didn't last very long. :(
But it's fitting. Everything you've said here for years is wrong, and
you think it's right, then you finally say one thing that's right, and
you think it's wrong. :)
ROTFLOL.....So you think that everything that you said for yearts is right?
Not everything, but at least my assessments regarding what you've posted to spr. Your claims are so glaringly illogical and/or so blatantly counterfactual that they're unmistakably wrong.
Have you ever heard of the ecpression that a shunk doesn't know it smells?
It fits you perfectly.
It would be ludicrous for me to try to explain to you what makes it
right, so instead I'll point out that if you believe your explanation is
wrong (i.e. circular), then you've yet to answer my question - i.e. how
can it be determined which of two clocks is the more accurate? Well, how?
You can't determine which clock is more accurate.
A clock's accuracy is determined by how well it's able to reproduce standard time intervals (e.g. calendar years, solar days, SI nanoseconds), and the accuracy of a particular type of clock is determined by the variability in the measurements of a collection of clocks of that type* (as you said during that fleeting bout of rationality).
* There will always be some variability - no two clocks can perform identically except to some limited precision over some limited time frame.
You can define that the
clock that can record the smallest time interval is more accurate.
Sure you can, but then you'd be the only one using that definition.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- References:
- DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: jem
- Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- From: kenseto
- DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Prev by Date: Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2
- Next by Date: Re: THE MEANING OF E = MC^2 - self promotion by crackpot Ajay Sharma
- Previous by thread: Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Next by thread: Re: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|