Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:07:44 GMT
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message news:XbzOg.77748$oT2.1054784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Nicolaas Vroom" <nicolaas.vroom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oJ9Og.75563$t31.1106993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Question:
| > Is it possible to explain the Twin Experiment from the moving point of
view ?
| >
| > IMO this is not possible.
| >
| > When the two Observers meet they realize that there clocks are not the
same.
| > To be more specific: The clock of the moving observer runs behind.
| > The clock of the moving observer runs slow.
| >
| > To explain the Observer at rest will say:
| > Look on my clock I read 10000 counts.
| > Based on the speed v (Lorentz Transformation) gamma is 0.5
| > That means your clock should read 5000 counts.
| > Which is what we measure. qed.
| >
| > The question is: Is it possible to explain this also from the
| > point of view of moving observer ?
| >
| > IMO this it not possible.
| > The moving Observer has to accept what the Observer at rest tells him.
| >
| > For more details goto : http://users.telenet.be/nicvroom/dirk3.htm
|
| From that page:
|
| | 1. When the clock of A reaches 1 time unit (t=1), A issues a light
signal to B.
| | 2. When B receives this signal, this defines the turnpoint P, B
returns back home
|
| Up to here everythig is okay.
Did''t they teach you to write E'glish in Belgia' k'itti'g classes?
How old are you?
| Now the trouble starts:
|
| | 3. The distance from A to point P is x.
| | 4. The time for the signal to go from A to B is t
|
| So you want the event [B2] to have coordinates (t,x). Bad idea.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
It's an excellent idea, you STOOPID moron!
You are as fucking crazy as that schoolmarm Tusselad
who reckons travelling 100 years in 173.2 years is 0.5c!
Can't even handle simple arithmetic, can you?
Bad idea, wanker!
And he called it DORK3!
ROFLMAO!
There has to be a fortune in laughs here, I'll save this one!
Androcles.
This distance is x
.
- References:
- The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Prev by Date: Re: HOCUS POCUS
- Next by Date: Re: HOCUS POCUS
- Previous by thread: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Next by thread: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Index(es):
Loading