Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: "Sorcerer" <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:49:48 GMT
"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:44f1u3-o7o.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Nice try but you're off by a factor of
| about 120.
What are you babbling about mass and energy for, fuckhead?
Speed has nothing all to do with mass. The most massive
object locally is the Earth and that has a speed of 0.0001c.
Where the *** did you get so confused?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- References:
- The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: G. L. Bradford
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Next by Date: Rebuttal to Ajay Sharma's nonsensical E=Amc^2
- Previous by thread: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Next by thread: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Index(es):