Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:10:27 GMT
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:M5gPg.81564$UT7.1169522@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
Yes, it takes the signal a time c/(c-v) to reach point [B].[snip]
Yes, it takes the signal a time c/(c-v) to reach point [B].
This message
M5gPg.81564$UT7.1169522@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
of mine was cancelled and replace with message
O8gPg.81578$Eu1.1258558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(sorry if this caused confusion)
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- References:
- The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Prev by Date: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Next by Date: Re: Notable philosophical stupidity by the great SRian
- Previous by thread: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Next by thread: Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?
- Index(es):