Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?


"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message news:7QaPg.81097$ZZ2.1210461@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Nicolaas Vroom" <nicolaas.vroom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O89Pg.80940$Uh2.1177712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
schreef in bericht
| > news:XbzOg.77748$oT2.1054784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >>
| >> "Nicolaas Vroom" <nicolaas.vroom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oJ9Og.75563$t31.1106993@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >>> Question:
| >>> Is it possible to explain the Twin Experiment from the moving point of
view ?
| >>>
| >>> IMO this is not possible.
| >>>
| >>> When the two Observers meet they realize that there clocks are not the
same.
| >>> To be more specific: The clock of the moving observer runs behind.
| >>> The clock of the moving observer runs slow.
| >>>
| >>> To explain the Observer at rest will say:
| >>> Look on my clock I read 10000 counts.
| >>> Based on the speed v (Lorentz Transformation) gamma is 0.5
| >>> That means your clock should read 5000 counts.
| >>> Which is what we measure. qed.
| >>>
| >>> The question is: Is it possible to explain this also from the
| >>> point of view of moving observer ?
| >>>
| >>> IMO this it not possible.
| >>> The moving Observer has to accept what the Observer at rest tells him.
| >>>
| >>> For more details goto : http://users.telenet.be/nicvroom/dirk3.htm
| >>
| >> From that page:
| >>
| >> | 1. When the clock of A reaches 1 time unit (t=1), A issues a light
signal to B.
| >> | 2. When B receives this signal, this defines the turnpoint P, B
returns back home
| >>
| >> Up to here everythig is okay.
| >> Now the trouble starts:
| >>
| >> | 3. The distance from A to point P is x.
| >> | 4. The time for the signal to go from A to B is t
| >>
| >> So you want the event [B2] to have coordinates (t,x). Bad idea.
| >>
| >> | 5. x = ct = (1+t)*v
| >> | 6. ct - vt = v
| >> | 7. t = v/(c-v) time units
| >>
| >> This is wrong.
| >
| > This is not wrong.
| > See below.
|
| It is wrong. I have given you the proof that it is wrong below.

Hey fuckhead, it's a typo, local village dog tord.
6. ct -vt = x
t(c-v) = x
7. t = x/(c-v)
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/figures/img31.gif
You couldn't prove a rocking horse has a wooden *** or a bear shits
in the woods, you dumb animal.

Androcles.


Androcles




.

Quantcast