Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations


N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear rambus2005:

<rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158586255.656926.183400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear rambus2005:

<rambus2005@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158551766.555198.281550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
The transverse Doppler effect is a FACT, it has been
fully verified by the experiments of Ives and Stilwell.

The TDE is a second order effect (an effect in (v/c)^2),
therefore it is VERY difficult to detect. Normally, the
experiments detecting it have a differential setup.

Occasionally claims like this resurface . A retired
engineer who doesn't understand the TDE sets up an
experiment incorrectly, detects nothing and goes
around making ridiculous claims.

You can ignore this if you like. This is an unmoderated
newsgroup.

Your actions are pretty close to "flaming", which is
something that is not supposed to happen here.

You are altering the titles of the posts, which makes
continuity of posts problematic. Some newsgroup
readers depend on the titles to decide which thread
they belong to.

Could you lighten up a little? You've taught them to
do the same thing...

I'm ignoring you . If you have nothing to say on a
scientific basis why don't you just shut up?

You are violating the newsgroup charter by flaming, and making
abusive comments to anyone you don't agree with. Further
violations will result in you being reported to your ISP.

Review those of 183 posts that you have authored, where in the
title alone you have named individual names, called them "wacko",
"clown", "moron", "donkey", "kook", "spammer", "imbecile",
"crank", "cretin", and more. This is certainly not Science, and
also does not work to shame them into understanding.


Yes, it does shame them (with some pathological exceptions). Especially
if the title is coupled with a sound scientific rebuttal. It also
exposes them to a google search,.

.

Quantcast