Re: SR false?
- From: "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:04:27 GMT
"Koobee Wublee" <koobee.wublee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1158684609.249727.122370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:
E' = (E - v * p) / sqrt(1 - v^2 / c^2)
** E' = h f'
** E = h f
** v = velocity vector of the platform as observed
** p = momentum vector of the photon
In your equation above, E' is the energy of the photon
in the observer's rest frame, while v is the velocity
of the observer in the source's rest frame, and p is
the momentum in the source's rest frame.
The crucial point which you probably missed, is that
if v and p are transverse in the source frame,
they are NOT transverse in the observer's frame,
and vice versa.
Stop taking cheap shots. My equation above is the same as yours.
Imbecile.
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/DiffGeoAero.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LorentzTale.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SRBogus.html
You don't even recognize an expensive shot when it hits
you flat in the face.
Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SR false?
- From: Sorcerer
- Re: SR false?
- References:
- SR false?
- From: Rudolf Drabek
- Re: SR false?
- From: Koobee Wublee
- SR false?
- Prev by Date: Re: HOCUS POCUS
- Next by Date: Re: Wrong experiments with incorrect foundations
- Previous by thread: Re: SR false?
- Next by thread: Re: SR false?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|