Re: SR false?


"shuba" <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:tim.shuba-DE669E.15245419092006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Rudi wrote:

What I can say as a "retired el. engineer" is, that SR is very limited.

In other words, your uninformed opinion about relativity is
irrelevant. You earlier said:

At the moment I'm not sure how to proceed.

Start by taking the "uni-linz.html" off the URL you gave, and
read the ridiculous biases of the people involved in that site.
Try again when you can point to an experiment that's not
published solely on yet another goofball site.


---Tim Shuba---

http://www.helmut-hille.de/uni-linz.html
| JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITÄT LINZ
| INSTITUT FÜR MIKROELEKTRONIK
| Univ.-Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Hartwig Thim

"The Greatest Living Philostopher Known to Mankind".
This really tells the whole tale I guess ;-)


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR false?
    ... |> Rudi wrote: ... your uninformed opinion about relativity is ... |> published solely on yet another goofball site. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR false?
    ... |> Rudi wrote: ... your uninformed opinion about relativity is ... |> published solely on yet another goofball site. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR false?
    ... Rudi wrote: ... your uninformed opinion about relativity is ... published solely on yet another goofball site. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)