Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?


"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jvvfu3-6a.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
| <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:44:23 GMT
| <bSPPg.128$PD.113@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| >
| > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
| > news:h754u3-dbb.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
| > | <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | wrote
| > | on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:53:31 GMT
| > | <faAPg.12736$cd1.5193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| > | >
| > | > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
| > message
| > | > news:93m2u3-gq5.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
| > | > | <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | > | wrote
| > | > | on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:49:48 GMT
| > | > | <MzpPg.7263$2Q4.1573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| > | > | >
| > | > | > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in
| > | > message
| > | > | > news:44f1u3-o7o.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | >
| > | > | > | Nice try but you're off by a factor of
| > | > | > | about 120.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > What are you babbling about mass and energy for, fuckhead?
| > | > | > Speed has nothing all to do with mass. The most massive
| > | > | > object locally is the Earth and that has a speed of 0.0001c.
| > | > | > Where the *** did you get so confused?
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > | 7 TeV proton looks like a tachyon to me...or would in a
| > | > | Newtonian universe. :-P
| > | >
| > | > Nice try, but 27,000 m * 11245Hz = 1.01c.
| > | > Explain what the operating frequency has to do with
| > | > the particles, shithead. You are hoist by your own petard.
| > |
| > | Ah, yes, you're hung up on that.
| >
| > I wanna see the tachyon... Whaaaa....
| > You promised... whaaaaaa!
| > Now prove 27,000 m * 11245Hz = 120c, fuckhead!
| >
| > What a MORON!
| >
|
| I'd like to see the tachyon as well. 120c should be plenty fast.
|
| A more accurate circumference diameter is 26659 meters, which resolves
| the "tachyon" difficulty.

A circumference diameter, huh?
There is a slight ratio of pi between circumference and diameter,
but I would not expect a relativist to understand that.
What a MORON!




.

Quantcast