Re: The Twin Paradox explained from the moving twin ?

In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
<Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Sat, 23 Sep 2006 16:16:31 GMT
<z5dRg.36107$wg.21247@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jvvfu3-6a.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
| <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote
| on Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:44:23 GMT
| <bSPPg.128$PD.113@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| >
| > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
| > news:h754u3-dbb.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
| > | <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | wrote
| > | on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:53:31 GMT
| > | <faAPg.12736$cd1.5193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| > | >
| > | > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
| > message
| > | > news:93m2u3-gq5.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | In sci.physics.relativity, Sorcerer
| > | > | <Headmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| > | > | wrote
| > | > | on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 04:49:48 GMT
| > | > | <MzpPg.7263$2Q4.1573@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
| > | > | >
| > | > | > "The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in
| > | > message
| > | > | > news:44f1u3-o7o.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | > | >
| > | > | > | Nice try but you're off by a factor of
| > | > | > | about 120.
| > | > | >
| > | > | > What are you babbling about mass and energy for, fuckhead?
| > | > | > Speed has nothing all to do with mass. The most massive
| > | > | > object locally is the Earth and that has a speed of 0.0001c.
| > | > | > Where the *** did you get so confused?
| > | > | >
| > | > |
| > | > | 7 TeV proton looks like a tachyon to me...or would in a
| > | > | Newtonian universe. :-P
| > | >
| > | > Nice try, but 27,000 m * 11245Hz = 1.01c.
| > | > Explain what the operating frequency has to do with
| > | > the particles, shithead. You are hoist by your own petard.
| > |
| > | Ah, yes, you're hung up on that.
| >
| > I wanna see the tachyon... Whaaaa....
| > You promised... whaaaaaa!
| > Now prove 27,000 m * 11245Hz = 120c, fuckhead!
| >
| > What a MORON!
| >
|
| I'd like to see the tachyon as well. 120c should be plenty fast.
|
| A more accurate circumference diameter is 26659 meters, which resolves
| the "tachyon" difficulty.

A circumference diameter, huh?
There is a slight ratio of pi between circumference and diameter,
but I would not expect a relativist to understand that.
What a MORON!

The circumference I'm referring to is the circumference
of the LHC. The "diameter" is apparently an artifact
of my overworked brain; obviously I can't keep up with
your intelligence.

Of course, since the trip is circular the average velocity
of the proton is in fact zero. (The average speed, of
course, is another matter entirely.)

--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Windows Vista. Because it's time to refresh your hardware. Trust us.
.

Quantcast